All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling domain hierarchy
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:22:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56018050.1010009@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5600DC4B.1000509@suse.com>

On 09/22/2015 05:42 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> One other thing I just discovered: there are other consumers of the
> topology sibling masks (e.g. topology_sibling_cpumask()) as well.
> 
> I think we would want to avoid any optimizations based on those in
> drivers as well, not only in the scheduler.

I'm beginning to lose the thread of the discussion here a bit.

Juergen / Dario, could one of you summarize your two approaches, and the
(alleged) advantages and disadvantages of each one?

Thanks,
 -George

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-22 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-18 15:55 [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling domain hierarchy Dario Faggioli
2015-08-18 16:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-08-20 18:16 ` Juergen Groß
2015-08-31 16:12   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-02 11:58     ` Juergen Gross
2015-09-02 14:08       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-02 14:30         ` Juergen Gross
2015-09-15 17:16           ` [Xen-devel] " Dario Faggioli
2015-09-15 16:50   ` Dario Faggioli
2015-09-21  5:49     ` Juergen Gross
2015-09-22  4:42       ` Juergen Gross
2015-09-22 16:22         ` George Dunlap [this message]
2015-09-23  4:36           ` Juergen Gross
2015-09-23  8:30             ` Dario Faggioli
2015-09-23  9:44               ` Juergen Gross
2015-09-23 10:23             ` George Dunlap
2015-09-23  7:24       ` Dario Faggioli
2015-09-23  7:35         ` Juergen Gross
2015-09-23 12:25           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-27 10:24 ` George Dunlap
2015-08-27 17:05   ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2015-09-15 14:32   ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56018050.1010009@citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.