From: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:12:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56036A05.8000805@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443055070.8829.36.camel@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 789 bytes --]
On 9/23/15 6:37 PM, Huang Ying wrote:
>>
>> I take it you have CONFIG_NET_VRF enabled. correct?
>>
>> With it disabled I see no relevant change in performance between
>> 8f58336d3f78 and 192132b9a034. Can you confirm?
>
> The kconfig file is attached with the mail. It appears that
> CONFIG_NET_VRF is disabled.
>
Something is not adding up. I anticipate access to a multi-socket numa
system in the next few days. Until then a couple of questions:
1. do you take patches to run your tests?
2. do you have a wiki/web page with all of the tests run? I'd like to
know what other networking tests have been run. Only this one was
flagged, so I presume it means other tests did not hit the threshold. I
would like to know what other tests are run.
Thanks,
David
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: lkp@01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:12:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56036A05.8000805@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443055070.8829.36.camel@intel.com>
On 9/23/15 6:37 PM, Huang Ying wrote:
>>
>> I take it you have CONFIG_NET_VRF enabled. correct?
>>
>> With it disabled I see no relevant change in performance between
>> 8f58336d3f78 and 192132b9a034. Can you confirm?
>
> The kconfig file is attached with the mail. It appears that
> CONFIG_NET_VRF is disabled.
>
Something is not adding up. I anticipate access to a multi-socket numa
system in the next few days. Until then a couple of questions:
1. do you take patches to run your tests?
2. do you have a wiki/web page with all of the tests run? I'd like to
know what other networking tests have been run. Only this one was
flagged, so I presume it means other tests did not hit the threshold. I
would like to know what other tests are run.
Thanks,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-24 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-20 12:30 [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps kernel test robot
2015-09-21 1:19 ` David Ahern
2015-09-21 1:19 ` [lkp] " David Ahern
2015-09-21 1:33 ` Huang Ying
2015-09-21 1:33 ` [lkp] " Huang Ying
2015-09-21 3:48 ` David Ahern
2015-09-21 3:48 ` [lkp] " David Ahern
2015-09-23 18:06 ` David Ahern
2015-09-23 18:06 ` [lkp] " David Ahern
2015-09-24 0:37 ` Huang Ying
2015-09-24 0:37 ` [lkp] " Huang Ying
2015-09-24 3:12 ` David Ahern [this message]
2015-09-24 3:12 ` David Ahern
2015-09-29 8:45 ` Huang, Ying
2015-09-29 8:45 ` [lkp] " Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56036A05.8000805@cumulusnetworks.com \
--to=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.