From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: preparing for 4.5.2 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:25:30 +0100 Message-ID: <56053D3A.4070305@citrix.com> References: <5605492802000078000A58EF@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <1443183472.25250.128.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfS5U-0006gh-BY for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:26:52 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1443183472.25250.128.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel , Jan Beulich , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 25/09/15 13:17, Ian Campbell wrote: > Ian, > > On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 05:16 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> All, >> >> with 4.5.2 being due in about 4 weeks please indicate to the respective >> maintainers backports you see missing from but consider relevant for >> the 4.5 stable branch. Please note that according to the outcome of a >> recent discussion we're intending to do this release without any RC. > > Running through my list of ARM backports I found these two tools commits > which according to my notes are the only thing blocking the use of 64K > pages in Linux on Xen 4.5. > > 506f87b tools/xenconsoled: Use XC_PAGE_SIZE rather than getpagesize() > 7c0a96a tools/xenstored: Use XC_PAGE_SIZE rather than getpagesize() > > Julien, is this still correct and is it still worth having for 4.5? Yes, I was about to send an email to ask for backporting them. Related to 64KB, there is another fix required in libxc: 31cf2ca tools/libxc: linux: Don't use getpagesize() when unmapping the grants Regards, -- Julien Grall