From: Corin Langosch <info@corinlangosch.com>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: network namespaces and conntrack
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:54:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56065D5A.9050701@corinlangosch.com> (raw)
Hi guys,
do network namespaces share conntrack data structures under the hood or does each netns get its own? So is it possible
that a (malicious) program in netns1 can overflow conntrack on the host or any other netns or is it safe? Can the tables
(size, hash size, ...) be tuned individually for each netns?
Cheers
Corin
reply other threads:[~2015-09-26 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56065D5A.9050701@corinlangosch.com \
--to=info@corinlangosch.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.