Re: [PATCH] virtio pmem: fix async flush ordering

[Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>]

> > > > >
> > > > > >  Remove logic to create child bio in the async flush function which
> > > > > >  causes child bio to get executed after parent bio
> > > > > >  'pmem_make_request'
> > > > > >  completes. This resulted in wrong ordering of REQ_PREFLUSH with
> > > > > >  the
> > > > > >  data write request.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Instead we are performing flush from the parent bio to maintain
> > > > > >  the
> > > > > >  correct order. Also, returning from function 'pmem_make_request'
> > > > > >  if
> > > > > >  REQ_PREFLUSH returns an error.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reported-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > There's a slight change in behavior for the error path in the
> > > > > virtio_pmem driver.  Previously, all errors from virtio_pmem_flush
> > > > > were
> > > > > converted to -EIO.  Now, they are reported as-is.  I think this is
> > > > > actually an improvement.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll also note that the current behavior can result in data
> > > > > corruption,
> > > > > so this should be tagged for stable.
> > > >
> > > > I added that and was about to push this out, but what about the fact
> > > > that now the guest will synchronously wait for flushing to occur. The
> > > > goal of the child bio was to allow that to be an I/O wait with
> > > > overlapping I/O, or at least not blocking the submission thread. Does
> > > > the block layer synchronously wait for PREFLUSH requests? If not I
> > > > think a synchronous wait is going to be a significant performance
> > > > regression. Are there any numbers to accompany this change?
> > >
> > > Why not just swap the parent child relationship in the PREFLUSH case?
> >
> > I we are already inside parent bio "make_request" function and we create
> > child
> > bio. How we exactly will swap the parent/child relationship for PREFLUSH
> > case?
> >
> > Child bio is queued after parent bio completes.
> 
> Sorry, I didn't quite mean with bio_split, but issuing another request
> in front of the real bio. See md_flush_request() for inspiration.

o.k. Thank you. Will try to post patch today to be considered for 5.4.

Best regards,
Pankaj
> 
>