From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: <56094589.504@arm.com> References: <1442152943-24493-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1698028.ftHN1K8oZa@vostro.rjw.lan> <560939A7.3030603@arm.com> <39030379.kalO2V72FV@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:50877 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755163AbbI1NuF (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:50:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <39030379.kalO2V72FV@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Len Brown , Hanjun Guo , Tomasz Nowicki , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 28/09/15 14:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, September 28, 2015 01:59:19 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 26/09/15 00:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >>>> Marc Zyngier (5): >>>> acpi: Add basic device probing infrastructure >>>> irqchip/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based irqchips >>>> irqchip/gic: Convert the GIC driver to ACPI probing >>>> clocksource/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based >>>> clocksources >>>> clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Convert to ACPI probing >>> >>> I'm generally fine with this (modulo a couple of super-minor nits in the >>> first patch), but it needs ACKs from Thomas for the irqchip-related and >>> clocksource-related patches. >> >> Sure. I've now addressed your comments, and I'll post the updated series >> later today. >> >>> Plus [3/5] needs to be rebased on top of the Al's patches removing BAD_MADT_ENTRY >>> (currently in my bleeding-edge branch). >> >> Al's patches were there on Friday, but vanished over the weekend. Do you >> have another (stable?) branch with these patches in (assuming they are >> still aimed at 4.4)? > > The Al's patches are gone for now, because they introduced a 0-day testing > regression. > > I guess this means I can apply your patches first and ask Al to rebase his > next version on them. OK. I'll rebase them on the current bleeding-edge, and post that. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:50:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure In-Reply-To: <39030379.kalO2V72FV@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1442152943-24493-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1698028.ftHN1K8oZa@vostro.rjw.lan> <560939A7.3030603@arm.com> <39030379.kalO2V72FV@vostro.rjw.lan> Message-ID: <56094589.504@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 28/09/15 14:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, September 28, 2015 01:59:19 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 26/09/15 00:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >>>> Marc Zyngier (5): >>>> acpi: Add basic device probing infrastructure >>>> irqchip/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based irqchips >>>> irqchip/gic: Convert the GIC driver to ACPI probing >>>> clocksource/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based >>>> clocksources >>>> clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Convert to ACPI probing >>> >>> I'm generally fine with this (modulo a couple of super-minor nits in the >>> first patch), but it needs ACKs from Thomas for the irqchip-related and >>> clocksource-related patches. >> >> Sure. I've now addressed your comments, and I'll post the updated series >> later today. >> >>> Plus [3/5] needs to be rebased on top of the Al's patches removing BAD_MADT_ENTRY >>> (currently in my bleeding-edge branch). >> >> Al's patches were there on Friday, but vanished over the weekend. Do you >> have another (stable?) branch with these patches in (assuming they are >> still aimed at 4.4)? > > The Al's patches are gone for now, because they introduced a 0-day testing > regression. > > I guess this means I can apply your patches first and ask Al to rebase his > next version on them. OK. I'll rebase them on the current bleeding-edge, and post that. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...