diff for duplicates of <560A0B4C.90206@ti.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 57b70e2..9ec0397 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ On Monday 28 September 2015 10:05 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Looks pretty good. I'm slightly concerned about the latency jitter impact > on -rt kernels for that local_irq_disable() section. Looks like it could -> hold off interrupts for ~(50 udelay µs) + 50*((RTC register read time) + +> hold off interrupts for ~(50 udelay ?s) + 50*((RTC register read time) + > 1). But I'm not sure if preempt_enable/disable() is a good alternative > since a bunch of interrupt top halves could conceivably run after the RTC > goes non-busy and result in the RTC not being locked/unlocked. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 06d9634..3c23f1f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,16 +2,10 @@ "ref\055DE9055.4090701@ti.com\0" "ref\056037FEA.5070807@ti.com\0" "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.02.1509280822250.7947@utopia.booyaka.com\0" - "From\0Lokesh Vutla <a0131933@ti.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: RTC: Add lock and unlock hooks\0" + "From\0a0131933@ti.com (Lokesh Vutla)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: RTC: Add lock and unlock hooks\0" "Date\0Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:23:48 +0530\0" - "To\0Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>\0" - "Cc\0Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>" - nsekhar@ti.com - t-kristo@ti.com - tony@atomide.com - linux-omap@vger.kernel.org - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Paul,\n" @@ -30,7 +24,7 @@ "> \n" "> Looks pretty good. I'm slightly concerned about the latency jitter impact \n" "> on -rt kernels for that local_irq_disable() section. Looks like it could \n" - "> hold off interrupts for ~(50 udelay \302\265s) + 50*((RTC register read time) + \n" + "> hold off interrupts for ~(50 udelay ?s) + 50*((RTC register read time) + \n" "> 1). But I'm not sure if preempt_enable/disable() is a good alternative \n" "> since a bunch of interrupt top halves could conceivably run after the RTC \n" "> goes non-busy and result in the RTC not being locked/unlocked. \n" @@ -54,4 +48,4 @@ "Thanks and regards,\n" Lokesh -11bbdf88b89bbccb9972d016db1b477308f7e462a2adef390f56e8fcfea22944 +f629b6f29e238e6f7d050017243c7230611c9f4d8d41a6f5e0aed2244dd4da18
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.