All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/pvhvm: add soft reset on kexec/kdump support
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:08:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560A8D63.5010302@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737xx4fp8.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>

On 09/29/2015 07:39 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> writes:
>
>> On 09/25/2015 03:35 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:19:57PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> On 09/25/2015 03:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>>>> On 09/25/2015 12:07 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>>>>>>> Also, I am not sure I see how this new op will be used in the
>>>>>>>> hypervisor --- currently AFAICS it is only processed under
>>>>>>>> is_hardware_domain(). Are there other patches that will support HVM
>>>>>>>> guests?
>>>>>>> Please see my Xen series:
>>>>>>> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-09/msg00547.html
>>>>>>> (last 'full' submission).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All patches from my 'toolstack-assisted approach to PVHVM guest kexec'
>>>>>>> are already merged to xen.git (first 10 are already in 'master' and the
>>>>>>> last one is in 'staging').
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, so I was looking at the right tree. Then I don't understand how
>>>>>> SHUTDOWN_soft_reset would be reached for a non-privileged domain. The only
>>>>>> path that I see is
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       domain_shutdown()
>>>>>>       {
>>>>>>           ...
>>>>>>           if ( is_hardware_domain(d) )
>>>>>>               hwdom_shutdown(reason);
>>>>>>           ...
>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there another path to handle this op?
>>>>> Yes:
>>>>>    e1bd9812966de9a16f30a58e7162b80bd6af361b libxc: support XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset operation
>>>>> and
>>>>>    c57e6ebd8c3e490e353e68d96abec1dad01e72f5 (lib)xl: soft reset support
>>>>>
>>>> That's toolstack issuing hypercalls from dom0.
>>>>
>>>> I am asking about (non-privileged) guest itself calling SCHEDOP_shutdown.
>>> The hypervisor ends up calling:
>>> __domain_finalise_shutdown which sends an VIRQ_DOM_EXC to dom0 which
>>> makes the toolstack do all of those operations.
>> OK. But the I don't see anyone checking that 'reason' (or
>> 'shutdown_code') is SHUTDOWN_soft_reset. In other words, the guest can
>> do 'xen_reboot(23)' or 'xen_reboot(154)'. Or, it seems, even
>> 'xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_reboot)'? The only value it shouldn't be is
>> SHUTDOWN_suspend.
> Xen hypervisor doesn't analyzie the reason, it is being analyzed by the
> toolstack (XEN_DOMCTL_getdomaininfo returns this info encoded in flags
> with XEN_DOMINF_shutdownshift shift).

Thanks.

My problem was that I didn't realize that toolstack generates macros for 
shutdown reasons from libxl_types.idl and I couldn't see who looks for 
SHUTDOWN_soft_reset.

-boris


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-29 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-25  9:59 [PATCH] xen/pvhvm: add soft reset on kexec/kdump support Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-09-25 13:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-25 15:54   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-25 15:54   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-25 16:07     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-09-25 16:07     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-09-25 17:17       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-25 17:17       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-25 19:01         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-25 19:01         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-25 19:19           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-25 19:19           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-25 19:35             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-25 19:35             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-25 21:00               ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-29 11:39                 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-09-29 11:39                 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-09-29 13:08                   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-29 13:08                   ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2015-09-25 21:00               ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-25 13:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-28 14:16 ` David Vrabel
2015-09-28 14:16 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-25  9:59 Vitaly Kuznetsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=560A8D63.5010302@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.