From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: fix dual-registration of uart4_ick
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:10:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560A8DB0.6020109@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5604DED0.5050403@ti.com>
On 25/09/15 06:42, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 09/23/2015 08:30 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> [150923 07:53]:
>>> On the OMAP AM3517 platform the uart4_ick gets registered
>>> twice, causing any power managment to /dev/ttyO3 to fail
>>> when trying to wake the device up.
>>>
>>> This solves the following oops:
>>>
>>> [] Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1028) at
>>> 0xfa09e008
>>> [] PC is at serial_omap_pm+0x48/0x15c
>>> [] LR is at _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x5c
>>
>> No uart4 on 34xx/35xx, that got introduced with 36xx so:
>>
>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clk/ti/clk-3xxx.c | 1 -
>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-3xxx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-3xxx.c
>>> index 5e12f32..2e7ef1f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-3xxx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-3xxx.c
>>> @@ -374,7 +374,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap3xxx_clks[] = {
>>> DT_CLK(NULL, "gpio2_ick", "gpio2_ick"),
>>> DT_CLK(NULL, "wdt3_ick", "wdt3_ick"),
>>> DT_CLK(NULL, "uart3_ick", "uart3_ick"),
>>> - DT_CLK(NULL, "uart4_ick", "uart4_ick"),
>>> DT_CLK(NULL, "gpt9_ick", "gpt9_ick"),
>>> DT_CLK(NULL, "gpt8_ick", "gpt8_ick"),
>>> DT_CLK(NULL, "gpt7_ick", "gpt7_ick"),
>
> NAK.
>
> This patch is actually only partially correct, it removes the uart4_ick
> alias for omap36xx also. It should be added back to the omap36xx clks
> array. Care to post a v2?
Thankyou for the feedback. I'll update, but do not have a device to test.
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 14:48 [PATCH] clk: ti: fix dual-registration of uart4_ick Ben Dooks
2015-09-23 15:15 ` Greg KH
2015-09-23 17:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-09-25 5:42 ` Tero Kristo
2015-09-25 5:42 ` Tero Kristo
2015-09-29 13:10 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2015-10-05 10:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-10-05 12:35 ` Tero Kristo
2015-10-05 12:35 ` Tero Kristo
2015-10-05 17:12 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560A8DB0.6020109@codethink.co.uk \
--to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.