From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: [ceph-users] [puppet] Moving puppet-ceph to the Openstack big tent Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:11:28 +0200 Message-ID: <560B0C90.1000500@dachary.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jdn9xvp4Ml4dqVjnP6ouQep0nxF1iUdml" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:34755 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754258AbbI2WLa (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:11:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andrew Woodward , David Moreau Simard , Ceph Development , ceph-users , Ceph User Committee Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --jdn9xvp4Ml4dqVjnP6ouQep0nxF1iUdml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good move :-) On 29/09/2015 23:45, Andrew Woodward wrote: > [I'm cross posting this to the other Ceph threads to ensure that it's s= een] >=20 > We've discussed this on Monday on IRC and again in the puppet-openstack= IRC meeting. The current census is that we will move from the deprecated= stackforge organization and will be moved to the openstack one. At this = time we will not be perusing membership as a formal OpenStack project. Th= is will allow puppet-ceph to retain the tight relationship with OpenStack= community and tools for the time being.=20 >=20 > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:32 AM David Moreau Simard > wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > puppet-ceph currently lives in stackforge [1] which is being retire= d > [2]. puppet-ceph is also mirrored on the Ceph Github organization [= 3]. > This version of the puppet-ceph module was created from scratch and= > not as a fork of the (then) upstream puppet-ceph by Enovance [4]. > Today, the version by Enovance is no longer officially maintained > since Red Hat has adopted the new release. >=20 > Being an Openstack project under Stackforge or Openstack brings a l= ot > of benefits but it's not black and white, there are cons too. >=20 > It provides us with the tools, the processes and the frameworks to > review and test each contribution to ensure we ship a module that i= s > stable and is held to the highest standards. > But it also means that: > - We forego some level of ownership back to the Openstack foundatio= n, > it's technical committee and the Puppet Openstack PTL. > - puppet-ceph contributors will also be required to sign the > Contributors License Agreement and jump through the Gerrit hoops [5= ] > which can make contributing to the project harder. >=20 > We have put tremendous efforts into creating a quality module and a= s > such it was the first puppet module in the stackforge organization = to > implement not only unit tests but also integration tests with third= > party CI. > Integration testing for other puppet modules are just now starting = to > take shape by using the Openstack CI inrastructure. >=20 > In the context of Openstack, RDO already ships with a mean to insta= ll > Ceph with this very module and Fuel will be adopting it soon as wel= l. > This means the module will benefit from real world experience and > improvements by the Openstack community and packagers. > This will help further reinforce that not only Ceph is the best > unified storage solution for Openstack but that we have means to > deploy it in the real world easily. >=20 > We all know that Ceph is also deployed outside of this context and > this is why the core reviewers make sure that contributions remain > generic and usable outside of this use case. >=20 > Today, the core members of the project discussed whether or not we > should move puppet-ceph to the Openstack big tent and we had a > consensus approving the move. > We would also like to hear the thoughts of the community on this to= pic. >=20 > Please let us know what you think. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > [1]: https://github.com/stackforge/puppet-ceph > [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192016/ > [3]: https://github.com/ceph/puppet-ceph > [4]: https://github.com/redhat-cip/puppet-ceph > [5]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/How_To_Contribute >=20 > David Moreau Simard > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-deve= l" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 > --=20 >=20 > -- >=20 > Andrew Woodward >=20 > Mirantis >=20 > Fuel Community Ambassador >=20 > Ceph Community >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --jdn9xvp4Ml4dqVjnP6ouQep0nxF1iUdml Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlYLDJAACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20ZUgCgr5ChXKwrem8gTaPUYBu+UFxt OhAAn0l5P8ZHpFdY0Uh9XTS9iCioplSI =zpJq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jdn9xvp4Ml4dqVjnP6ouQep0nxF1iUdml--