Re: MAX_RBD_IMAGES

[Dan Mick <dmick@redhat.com>]

Doesn't mean anything.  It was just a medium-large number of emulated
targets.  The choice had nothing to do with the kernel.

On 09/29/2015 08:58 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
> I just want to know what that number means.
> 
> Based on the Linux kenel, that number doesn't make sense but, for the Ceph cluster, would make sense from performance, resource handling including networking resource point of views.
> 
> So, do you remember?
> 
> Shinobu
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Mick" <dmick@redhat.com>
> To: "Shinobu Kinjo" <skinjo@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 9:04:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [CEPH-DEVEL] MAX_RBD_IMAGES
> 
> On 09/22/2015 02:55 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does any of you know why *MAX_RBD_IMAGES* was changed from 16 to 128?
>> I hope that Dan remember -;
>>
>> http://resources.ustack.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2a6dcabf7f1b7550a0fa4fd223970ffc24ad7870
>>
>>  - Shinobu
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> to....have more of them?
>