From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.4 Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 22:31:08 +0200 Message-ID: <560EE98C.5090202@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tbR3abCNVTbg82sjiEFB4B5b1iKCtprUO" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:36658 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751023AbbJBUbL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:31:11 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yehuda Sadeh Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek Varshney This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --tbR3abCNVTbg82sjiEFB4B5b1iKCtprUO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Yehuda, The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/ham= mer passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#note-58). = Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round o= f testing ? Cheers P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#Release-information has direct = links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.3 in case you n= eed more context about one of them. --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --tbR3abCNVTbg82sjiEFB4B5b1iKCtprUO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlYO6YwACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21GVwCdF1x9KOgoAEZEra8rcKknu4nY 4aEAn12JZQHzStFDGoY3DNCiV834vkwT =AxrA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tbR3abCNVTbg82sjiEFB4B5b1iKCtprUO--