From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] bdc_pci: use PCI_VDEVICE() instead of PCI_DEVICE()
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:13:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56127764.8050801@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151005031619.GC27303@kroah.com>
Hello.
On 10/5/2015 6:16 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> Fix using the PCI_DEVICE() macro instead of less verbose PCI_VDEVICE().
> Why?
Seemed a good idea to me back in March. :-)
> I hate PCI_VDEVICE(), it's impossible to grep for things and does
Didn't think about grepping...
> not help with readability and is pointless. My one wish was that when I
> was the PCI maintainer I would have just deleted the thing from the
> kernel entirely instead of leaving it there hoping no one would use it.
Thanks for the idea. :-)
> I don't like these types of pointless patches, sorry.
I hope you don't have the same strong feelings about PCI_DEVICE_SUB().
There's one place (in ohci-pci.c IIRC) it can be used...
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
MBR, Sergei
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-05 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-04 20:38 [PATCH 0/8] USB: use PCI_VDEVICE() instead of PCI_DEVICE() Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-04 20:50 ` [PATCH 1/8] ehci-pci: " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-04 20:52 ` [PATCH 2/8] ohci-pci:-use-PCI_VDEVICE() " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-04 20:55 ` [PATCH 3/8] chipidea: ci_hdrc_pci: use PCI_VDEVICE() " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-04 21:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] dwc2: pci: " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-04 21:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] dwc3-pci: " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-04 21:04 ` [PATCH 6/8] amd5536udc: " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-04 21:07 ` [PATCH 7/8] pch_udc: " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-04 21:08 ` [PATCH 8/8] bdc_pci: " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-05 3:16 ` Greg KH
2015-10-05 13:13 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56127764.8050801@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.