From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Delpont Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 10:08:41 +0000 Subject: [mlmmj] address duplication in subscribers list Message-Id: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020602030206080804060708" List-Id: To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org --------------020602030206080804060708 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I have a lot of duplicates in my subscribers addresses. I use mlmmj-sub to subscribe addresses, and it seems that this command don't check if the address already exists before subscribing it ! Is it a bug or a missing fonctionnality ? Marc --------------020602030206080804060708 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi,

I have a lot of duplicates in my subscribers addresses.
I use mlmmj-sub to subscribe addresses, and it seems that this command don't check if the address already exists before subscribing it !
Is it a bug or a missing fonctionnality ?

Marc
--------------020602030206080804060708-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achilleas Pipinellis Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 11:22:38 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] address duplication in subscribers list Message-Id: <56125D7E.4010605@axilleas.me> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="AUUERFVPFt8x7FxlQJ33vfSwVvnC0iid8" List-Id: References: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> In-Reply-To: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --AUUERFVPFt8x7FxlQJ33vfSwVvnC0iid8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/05/2015 01:08 PM, Marc Delpont wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have a lot of duplicates in my subscribers addresses. > I use mlmmj-sub to subscribe addresses, and it seems that this command > don't check if the address already exists before subscribing it ! > Is it a bug or a missing fonctionnality ? >=20 > Marc Hi Marc, I had the same issue and it was due to the fact I was using an old versio= n. See the discussion here http://mlmmj.org/archive/mlmmj/2015-05/0000003.ht= ml --=20 GPG : 0x3A7DDABC985EDC6E Blog: http://axilleas.me --AUUERFVPFt8x7FxlQJ33vfSwVvnC0iid8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWEl1+AAoJEBTqGDGsMtXMSb8QALLeOPFZUFLiEb25dI9qcmvf 1+2CVQnYqyX/23OrGXBNxal3PJ5NaOjT0yKGkU3E4I8yFDXxJcCUvAEEnfbsyGJZ r8hjb3Vmxz1JCXCH5xLAHOF7WqTqSogpEIPPhr6k/7L2VljM8rT5X7FJiFdYjy/4 1Nn6Z51NpORvBbxzv560gFKi1UDdWR4Y8s1rPZvaCRfxCExJOwu/a4AHzNLJcE8p VBlY/8Gv/ytzPXDXKXLpm4UUHFKDnF92zQ1nL7aNNzAlViQK9QQ72J8KJdI7qxO0 TreYgHco0IrBWqsKBeC0OAigKe/45ffP1huotQzFHEsNfPqF58Dp+MIHt27kE0a9 Hw/+9pTCWXFb1iKid7CBr9PnCQMKJnD80Cf00IgP0fltt3G1nMnDUR9wrbuvio4u yr26j09G+zTwhPoOjrFVIXp4zPgT87kgZILkXYsmjFrnUWc8TgaX/Nch1COthbPj ti41NytNtTfVBa3Ed2NIc0X+D7OnO/u/REAsCWID2ngePLl3qwR12bMb5eZA4Tue LC/ZVLF3UivvmDjH2GPxwIJkc+mdnfqgiu2F3WekaRJyfCslv2Lo/rCnXndDJPgy gaZD5081y0yoEG8Mlj+7wt5enIg7ew0fD2Z/jddzmlgOCDHbXoJ56NvIYQg/eyJn Om4045gPBf6nuNDFnN9P =ukp6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AUUERFVPFt8x7FxlQJ33vfSwVvnC0iid8-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Delpont Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:21:18 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] address duplication in subscribers list Message-Id: <56126B3E.90505@firstweb.fr> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010609030604000703020801" List-Id: References: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> In-Reply-To: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org --------------010609030604000703020801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 05/10/2015 13:22, Achilleas Pipinellis a =C3=A9crit : > On 10/05/2015 01:08 PM, Marc Delpont wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a lot of duplicates in my subscribers addresses. >> I use mlmmj-sub to subscribe addresses, and it seems that this command= >> don't check if the address already exists before subscribing it ! >> Is it a bug or a missing fonctionnality ? >> >> Marc > Hi Marc, > > I had the same issue and it was due to the fact I was using an old vers= ion. > > See the discussion here http://mlmmj.org/archive/mlmmj/2015-05/0000003.= html > I'm using version 1.2.18 that is the last stable debian package, and is=20 not a so old version ! --------------010609030604000703020801 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le 05/10/2015 13:22, Achilleas Pipinellis a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:

On 10/05/2015 01:08 PM, Marc Delpont wrote:

Hi,

I have a lot of duplicates in my subscribers addresses.
I use mlmmj-sub to subscribe addresses, and it seems that this command
don't check if the address already exists before subscribing it !
Is it a bug or a missing fonctionnality ?

Marc

Hi Marc,

I had the same issue and it was due to the fact I was using an old versio=
n.

See the discussion here http://mlmmj.org/archive/m=
lmmj/2015-05/0000003.html

I'm using version 1.2.18 that is the last stable= debian package, and is not a so old version !

--------------010609030604000703020801-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achilleas Pipinellis Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:28:43 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] address duplication in subscribers list Message-Id: <56126CFB.3040400@axilleas.me> List-Id: References: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> In-Reply-To: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 10/05/2015 03:21 PM, Marc Delpont wrote: > Le 05/10/2015 13:22, Achilleas Pipinellis a =C3=A9crit : >> On 10/05/2015 01:08 PM, Marc Delpont wrote: >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> I have a lot of duplicates in my subscribers addresses. I use >>> mlmmj-sub to subscribe addresses, and it seems that this >>> command don't check if the address already exists before >>> subscribing it ! Is it a bug or a missing fonctionnality ? >>>=20 >>> Marc >> Hi Marc, >>=20 >> I had the same issue and it was due to the fact I was using an >> old version. >>=20 >> See the discussion here >> http://mlmmj.org/archive/mlmmj/2015-05/0000003.html >>=20 >=20 > I'm using version 1.2.18 that is the last stable debian package, > and is not a so old version ! >=20 If you read the discussion I had the same problem and I had to use apt pinning to upgrade to a latest version where this bug is fixed. - --=20 GPG : 0x3A7DDABC985EDC6E Blog: http://axilleas.me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWEmz7AAoJEBTqGDGsMtXM/BgP/1Po3Uz9Nunqm4UppCPsh6rB K7n1SiXs6sDztt48gzqz7olxY9s7rbi3mDa7gJmXhLfeY+fWiLuEpeqSvmIlOCQF Q3cTrbujZ9rpg3a33KD4ABB1NegimfF/BisRJLoV8z79RFo4M89Ap81byb305Enh JuymUh2/3feSpz3xChAWDVB3cSJcQBcI1SEbmE+T7tqWDtp92OYyqePuCzKa+t+e O+zuK4ID9J+3HW0v20cwFqw9xrjIoAiAe2HFe7tgXRRTzdUxO/W+kgjkx+pI5V2G sLCq/lOHSICwDTqLkI5kEG3tg0S6yFGOEHIs0rhzEb17/xNhq5zRbTqZitj+E7XS dmXaRFdGD5scCE9yxis1zHGS8CUCgRDtJWeHr7lL4MLjHE4Q+yvTaexVd4VfJfFg eU/TmXvzfWMd0h4LgCOIq3ruMEFiK7X8tKJtmGLyQeZWHoCcRXSECCsPdT5KBn2L VYo0Z+8u0zR8mLlSYbWBstYqI04JdMY5WHU4LeEnEbPL1JyAjKjGoUjabSDK0/+3 7d1RV2e3VBLSNtETsqOFhsGE2OVOh0g2XkO0I3iHjsuBWVND+2miUSpZ7IPpwHzs QTx1Jlkv7/nHKLK2SPjoZlBtPbJ+9SPmkXfxtaxInzFYLlRYPWX73VSBx0cP8BhU mZ+p9QbvFD7ZAZFVBLUY =3DzR2P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "A. Schulze" Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:33:56 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] address duplication in subscribers list Message-Id: <20151005153356.Horde.RZ1_Sow1faMGs9dEuwU73-5@andreasschulze.de> List-Id: References: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> In-Reply-To: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org Marc Delpont: > I'm using version 1.2.18 that is the last stable debian package, and > is not a so old version ! using the latest package from $os-vendor does not mean using the current version: http://mlmmj.org/hg/mlmmj/file/RELEASE_1_2_19_0/ChangeLog#l11 Andreas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryein Goddard Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:04:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] address duplication in subscribers list Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="047d7b67383abeb18805215cd551" List-Id: References: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> In-Reply-To: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org --047d7b67383abeb18805215cd551 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable unsubscribe me On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:33 AM, A. Schulze wrote: > > Marc Delpont: > > I'm using version 1.2.18 that is the last stable debian package, and is >> not a so old version ! >> > > using the latest package from $os-vendor does not mean using the current > version: > > http://mlmmj.org/hg/mlmmj/file/RELEASE_1_2_19_0/ChangeLog#l11 > > Andreas > > > > --=20 *Ryein C. Goddard* System Administrator, Software Engineer, & Consultant. Phone =E2=80=93 (971) 599-3501 We can be reached from 9 AM to 5 PM PST If you have an after hours emergency, off-hour rates may apply. --047d7b67383abeb18805215cd551 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

unsubscribe me

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:33 AM, A. Schulze <sc= a@andreasschulze.de> wrote:

Marc Delpont:

I'm using version 1.2.18 that is the last stable debian package, and is= not a so old version !

using the latest package from $os-vendor does not mean using the current ve= rsion:

http://mlmmj.org/hg/mlmmj/file/RELEASE_= 1_2_19_0/ChangeLog#l11

Andreas

Ryein C= . Goddard

System Administr= ator, Software Engineer, & Consultant.

Phone =E2=80=93 (971) 599-3501

We can be reached from 9 AM to 5 PM PST

If you have an after = hours emergency, off-hour rates may apply.

--047d7b67383abeb18805215cd551-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Delpont Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:45:22 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] address duplication in subscribers list Message-Id: <56129B12.50203@firstweb.fr> List-Id: References: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> In-Reply-To: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org A. Schulze : > > using the latest package from $os-vendor does not mean using the > current version: > > http://mlmmj.org/hg/mlmmj/file/RELEASE_1_2_19_0/ChangeLog#l11 > > Andreas > Thanks for this precision ! I was just pointing out that the penultimate revision of the last version can't seriously be considered as an "old" version. Marc From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Knadle Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:27:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] address duplication in subscribers list Message-Id: <56154807.6020808@coredump.us> List-Id: References: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> In-Reply-To: <56124C29.3080502@firstweb.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org Marc Delpont: > A. Schulze : >> >> using the latest package from $os-vendor does not mean using the current >> version: >> >> http://mlmmj.org/hg/mlmmj/file/RELEASE_1_2_19_0/ChangeLog#l11 >> >> Andreas >> > > Thanks for this precision ! > > I was just pointing out that the penultimate revision of the last version > can't seriously be considered as an "old" version. That depends on your point of view. Your report was "hey this is broken", but it's been fixed "upstream" more than a year ago and Debian *Oldstable* (Wheezy) version doesn't have the fix. From that point of view, Debian Oldstable's version is old. Debian Stable (Jessie), Testing (Stretch) and Unstable (Sid) all have mlmmj 1.2.8.1-1 which should have the fix. It is possible to fix in Debian Stable and Oldstable, but the rules for those releases is that they can only get *important* fixes, not new versions... so to fix this someone would need to come up with the minimal patch required to fix the bug and submit it to a bug report. Then the maintainer could upload that fix as "mlmmj-1.2.8-1+deb8u1" to a pending-proposed-updates repository, which will then get incorporated into the distribution on the next "point release" of that distribution. (Usually every 3 months or so.) I don't think this particular bug would be considered worth going through all this. The easiest way around all this would be to backport the package for Wheezy and put it into an external repository. I just did this (because I'm likewise running mlmmj on Wheezy), so if you want it, it's available here: http://debian-packages.coredump.us direct link if you just want the .deb files than to add the repo: http://debian-packages.coredump.us/debian/pool/main/m/mlmmj/ -- Chris -- Chris Knadle Chris.Knadle@coredump.us