From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: slash.tmp@free.fr (Mason)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:21:25 +0200
Subject: Dropping "depends on SMP" for HAVE_ARM_TWD -- take 2
In-Reply-To: <20151002180255.GK12338@codeaurora.org>
References: <560E53E3.7070207@free.fr> <560E8584.8000207@free.fr>
 <20151002180255.GK12338@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <56138485.4090600@free.fr>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 02/10/2015 20:02, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> The warning has been removed in commit 5028090d1da1 (ARM: 8434/1:
> Revert "7655/1: smp_twd: make twd_local_timer_of_register() no-op
> for nosmp", 2015-09-14) sitting in linux-next. Oddly, that commit
> doesn't remove the depends on SMP for the Kconfig. So it seems
> that we can apply this patch and everyone is happy? We could also
> drop the "if SMP" part of most of the platform selects if anyone
> actually cares.
> 
> ---8<----
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 369791fb619c..be64d9d604c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -1389,7 +1389,6 @@ config HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>  
>  config HAVE_ARM_TWD
>  	bool
> -	depends on SMP
>  	select CLKSRC_OF if OF
>  	help
>  	  This options enables support for the ARM timer and watchdog unit

Hello Stephen,

Should I make a formal submission for the above patch to be accepted?

(Did you see my "twd: Don't set CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP unconditionally"
patch? What should I do now for it to be accepted?)

Regards.