From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.4 Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 17:16:26 +0200 Message-ID: <5613E5CA.2060903@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rvHPQeRNGJbjlQpbgpN6RMmsFOdOXAhFk" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:38197 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751727AbbJFPQe (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:16:34 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek Varshney This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --rvHPQeRNGJbjlQpbgpN6RMmsFOdOXAhFk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Greg, The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/ham= mer passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#note-66). D= o you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of= testing ? Cheers P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#Release-information has direct = links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.3 in case you n= eed more context about one of them. --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --rvHPQeRNGJbjlQpbgpN6RMmsFOdOXAhFk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlYT5coACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23WvQCfd9A/or9T1G5I9HNs2J8hP0qg hhsAnjr+Gyf5rtFxAJlxQhlzyHCsqIV0 =pCpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rvHPQeRNGJbjlQpbgpN6RMmsFOdOXAhFk--