From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/libxc: Improve efficiency of xc_cpuid_apply_policy()
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:54:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5615080A.8060200@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444218749.1410.21.camel@citrix.com>
On 07/10/15 12:52, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 10:14 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:12:17PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> Having the internals of xc_cpuid_policy() make hypercalls to collect
>>> domain
>>> information causes xc_cpuid_apply_policy() to be very inefficient.
>>>
>>> Re-order operations to collect all information at once at the outermost
>>> layer,
>>> and pass a structure in to all cpuid policy generation functions.
>>>
>>> This removes several hypercalls (4 from HVM, 3 from PV) for each of the
>>> up-to 108 leaves processed.
>>>
>>> No change in the eventual policy provided, although all the information
>>> gathering how has (or has correct) error checking.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>>> ---
>>> CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
>>> CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
>>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> Applied.
>
>>> + /* PV-only information. */
>>> + bool pv64;
>>> +
>>> + /* HVM-only infomation. */
> Typo fixed
Oops - thanks.
>
>
>>> + bool pae;
>>> + bool nestedhvm;
>> I would have used union for these fields. But I don't want to bikeshed
>> too much on this. Definitely not a blocker for this patch. :-)
> Indeed.
It appears that I forgot to reply. I have further work which removes
these, but they are not in a suitable state for the list yet.
~Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-07 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-05 13:12 [PATCH] tools/libxc: Improve efficiency of xc_cpuid_apply_policy() Andrew Cooper
2015-10-06 9:14 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-07 11:52 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-07 11:54 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5615080A.8060200@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.