On 6 October 2015 at 14:43, Petter Mabäcker <petter@technux.se> wrote:

Great. As you will notice also when formatted properly it will not apply due to that readline63-001 and readline63-002 isn't applied so 'patchlevel' is incorrect. That makes me wondering what the patching strategy is? In my opinion we should consider adding the official readline-6.3 patches as well. Should I add a bug report for that or leave it as is (depending on the strategy...)?

Adding the rest of the patches would have been a sensible thing to do. Right now, we're frozen as we're about to release 2.0, but a bug or patches post-release would be much appreciated.

Ross