From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: remove unused wrappers for python Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 06:16:42 +0200 Message-ID: <5615EE2A.6030303@suse.com> References: <20151006113902.GY29124@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1444138837.5302.174.camel@citrix.com> <5613DFF9.6000309@suse.com> <1444144260.5302.212.camel@citrix.com> <5613E706.2060807@suse.com> <1444145211.5302.221.camel@citrix.com> <5613E918.4020509@oracle.com> <1444146359.5302.227.camel@citrix.com> <5613F366.1010006@suse.com> <1444148662.5302.244.camel@citrix.com> <20151008011056.GA22076@andromeda.dapyr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151008011056.GA22076@andromeda.dapyr.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Ian Campbell Cc: Wei Liu , stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, Andrew Cooper , ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Zhigang Wang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/08/2015 03:10 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:24:22PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 18:14 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >> >>> The original motivation was to get rid of the "superpages" option when >>> building a pv-domU. >> >> It's suffered rather from feature creep then, since removing that one >> interface seems like much less of a problem[0] than a wholesale skewering >> of bindings of entire librarier or even just cherry-picking the things no >> one is using and removing those. >> >> It's worth trying to clean up these legacy things occasionally and seeing >> who complains, but when someone does complain its usually time to step back >> and examine what the actual goal is and what the path to that place is. >> >> Unless you have the stomach for helping manage a transition away from the >> parts of these bindings that people are still using then I'd suggest just >> leaving it alone and concentrating on the superpages thing and whether that >> can be removed or what needs to happen first etc. >> >> Ian. >> >> [0] although we are still waiting for Konrad's reply on that one in the >> relevant thread. > > RIP PV superpages. Okay, I'll do this as soon as Roger's domain builder patches are committed. Juergen