From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
To: "Devon H. O'Dell" <dho@fastly.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf, skb_do_redirect: clear sender_cpu before xmit
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 19:35:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561727D5.2070001@plumgrid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADe=ujYvfU_h46cQXiG6Vt1iZfs+A7fYqeZ_vWtob2Kef08ukQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/8/15 5:50 PM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
>> with the amount of skb_sender_cpu_clear() all over the code base
>> >I wonder whether there is a better solution to all of these.
> I think there is. We found that splitting the union of sender_cpu and
> napi_id solved the issue for us. In general, I think this is an OK
> solution as long as the following hold:
>
> * skbs are always allocated via kzalloc
> * out -> out cloned skbs are always cloned on the same CPU
> * an extra four bytes in skbuff isn't a bad thing
I'm pretty sure extending sk_buff for this is not acceptable.
I was thinking may be we can use sign bit to distinguish between
napi_id and sender_cpu.
Like:
if ((int)skb->sender_cpu >= 0)
skb->sender_cpu = - (raw_smp_processor_id() + 1);
and inside get_xps_queue() use it only if it's negative.
Then we can remove skb_sender_cpu_clear() from everywhere.
Adding a check to napi_hash_add() to make sure that napi_id is not
negative is probably ok too.
Thoughts?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-09 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-07 8:16 [PATCH net-next] bpf, skb_do_redirect: clear sender_cpu before xmit Daniel Borkmann
2015-10-07 15:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-09 0:50 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2015-10-09 2:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2015-10-09 16:40 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2015-10-10 3:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-09 17:33 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-10-10 3:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-10 4:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-10 4:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-10 4:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-10 17:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-11-16 18:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-08 12:07 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561727D5.2070001@plumgrid.com \
--to=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dho@fastly.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.