Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] nv50, nvc0: don't base decisions on available pushbuf space

[Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>]

On 10/10/2015 10:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
> <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/10/2015 09:58 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
>>> <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/10/2015 09:42 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
>>>>> <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> This patch looks fine except that it should be a bit more normalized. I
>>>>>> mean, sometimes you break when PUSH_SPACE fails, sometimes not. Same
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> PUSH_SPACE calls, sometimes you add it sometimes not.
>>>>> Meh. We need to get our error checking situation straight, but this
>>>>> isn't the patch to do it in.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, but this needs to be clarified.
>>> What does?
>>
>> I mean, we should either use PUSH_SPACE everywhere or not at all, and always
>> breaks (or not) when PUSH_SPACE fails.
>> That's really a minor issue.
> It's actually a major issue. Error-handling is practically
> non-existent. There are a couple of spots here and there, but it
> doesn't really scale up. I guess I (semi-)accidentally removed a
> couple of spots that error checked, but, again, meh. Doing this for
> real will require some careful thought.

Yeah, okay. So we really need to improve error-handling. :)

>    -ilia

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev