From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] IB/iser: set block queue_virt_boundary Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 14:22:37 -0700 Message-ID: <561AD31D.6070701@sandisk.com> References: <1444577707-15778-1-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> <1444577707-15778-2-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz , Sagi Grimberg Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Jens Axboe , "Martin K. Petersen" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 10/11/15 12:04, Or Gerlitz wrote: > If the 4X assertion made here is correct, why not keeping the current > BB logic to come into play for such devices? I know that without the > BB code our driver looks much nicer and elegant, but life is sometimes > more complex... thoughts? Hello Or, Whether or not this 4x assertion is correct, logic like the bounce buffer mechanism that is removed by this patch series belongs in the block layer core and not in a SCSI LLD. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html