From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] lvcreate: support --force option
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:02:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561B7728.5010804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561B8AEB020000E10001DD25@relay2.provo.novell.com>
Dne 12.10.2015 v 04:26 Lidong Zhong napsal(a):
> Hi Zdenek,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>>>> On 10/10/2015 at 09:17 PM, in message <56190FE5.1030900@redhat.com>, Zdenek
> Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Dne 10.10.2015 v 12:39 Lidong Zhong napsal(a):
>>> The option is supported in the logic of lvcreate but is omitted in
>>> commands.h.
>>>
>>
>> Nope - it's not intended to be unsupported so far.
>>
>> We do support --yes to overcome prompts.
>>
>> Normally --force is meant to be used on paths to proceed with
>> i.e. lvremove, lvconvert
>>
>> Do you have any case in mind where '--force' with lvcreate would have make any
>>
>> sense ?
>
> Not really. I met this problem when I was using lvcreate with the --wipesignature option.
> --yes works for me. But I also found that --force should also work when I read the source.
> However, it reports -f/--force is an invalid option for lvcreate.
Yep - and so far it should stay that way - --force has special meaning for
being quite unsafe operation.
>
>> IMHO creating something with --force looks to me like crazy idea to start with
>>
>> - but maybe there is some use-case I'm missing ?
>>
>
> Currently there is no introduction to --yes in the manpage of lvcreate. How about adding it to
> the manpage?
Every lvm man page references 'man lvm' as the source of description for all
'commonly' accepted options (like --yes).
One day we may switch to 'generated' man pages - where very man page would
have all options described - but I guess this 'day' is still pretty far away ;)
Regards
Zdenek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-10 10:39 [PATCH] lvcreate: support --force option Lidong Zhong
2015-10-10 13:17 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2015-10-12 2:26 ` Lidong Zhong
2015-10-12 9:02 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2015-10-26 10:07 ` Lidong Zhong
2015-10-26 13:42 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2015-10-27 2:29 ` Lidong Zhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561B7728.5010804@redhat.com \
--to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
--cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.