All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
	"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
	Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@huawei.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<acme@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	<masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	<daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <pi3orama@163.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] bpf: Implement bpf_perf_event_sample_enable/disable() helpers
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:54:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561CE2DB.2030409@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561C9361.6090104@plumgrid.com>

hi, Alexei

>> What about using similar
>> implementation
>> like PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_OUTPUT, creating a new ioctl like
>> PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_ENABLER,
>> then let perf to select an event as 'enabler', then BPF can still
>> control one atomic
>> variable to enable/disable a set of events.
>
> you lost me on that last sentence. How this 'enabler' will work?
> Also I'm still missing what's wrong with perf doing ioctl() on
> events on all cpus manually when bpf program tells it to do so.
> Is it speed you concerned about or extra work in perf ?
>
>

For not having too much wakeups, perf ringbuffer has a watermark
limit to cache events and reduce the wakeups, which causes perf
userspace tool can not receive perf events immediately.

Here's a simple demo expamle to prove it, 'sleep_exec' does some
writes and prints a timestamp every second, and an lable is
printed when perf poll gets events.

   $ perf record -m 2 -e syscalls:sys_enter_write sleep_exec 1000
   userspace sleep time: 0 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 1 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 2 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 3 seconds
   perf record wakeup onetime 0
   userspace sleep time: 4 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 5 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 6 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 7 seconds
   perf record wakeup onetime 1
   userspace sleep time: 8 seconds
   perf record wakeup onetime 2
   ..

   $ perf record -m 1 -e syscalls:sys_enter_write sleep_exec 1000
   userspace sleep time: 0 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 1 seconds
   perf record wakeup onetime 0
   userspace sleep time: 2 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 3 seconds
   perf record wakeup onetime 1
   userspace sleep time: 4 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 5 seconds
   ..

By default, if no mmap_pages is specified, perf tools wakeup only
when the target executalbe finished:

   $ perf record -e syscalls:sys_enter_write sleep_exec 5
   userspace sleep time: 0 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 1 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 2 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 3 seconds
   userspace sleep time: 4 seconds
   perf record wakeup onetime 0
   [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
   [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.006 MB perf.data (54 samples) ]

If we want perf to reflect as soon as our sample event be generated,
--no-buffering should be used, but this option has a greater
impact on performance.

   $ perf record --no-buffering -e syscalls:sys_enter_write sleep_exec 1000
   userspace sleep time: 0 seconds
   perf record wakeup onetime 0
   perf record wakeup onetime 1
   perf record wakeup onetime 2
   perf record wakeup onetime 3
   perf record wakeup onetime 4
   perf record wakeup onetime 5
   perf record wakeup onetime 6
   ..

Thank you


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-13 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-12  9:02 [RFC PATCH 0/2] bpf: enable/disable events stored in PERF_EVENT_ARRAY maps trace data output when perf sampling Kaixu Xia
2015-10-12  9:02 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf: Add the flag sample_disable not to output data on samples Kaixu Xia
2015-10-12 12:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12 12:05     ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-12 12:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12 14:14   ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-12 19:20   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-13  2:30     ` xiakaixu
2015-10-13  3:10       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-13 12:00   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-12  9:02 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] bpf: Implement bpf_perf_event_sample_enable/disable() helpers Kaixu Xia
2015-10-12 19:29   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-13  3:27     ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-13  3:39       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-13  3:51         ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-13  4:16           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-13  4:34             ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-13  5:15               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-13  6:57                 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-13 10:54                 ` He Kuang [this message]
2015-10-13 11:07                   ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-14  5:14                   ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=561CE2DB.2030409@huawei.com \
    --to=hekuang@huawei.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pi3orama@163.com \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --cc=xiakaixu@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.