From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Koro Chen <koro.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH] ASoC: Modify check condition of multiple bindings of components
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:42:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561D1843.1020007@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444745902.26493.2.camel@mtksdaap41>
On 10/13/2015 04:18 PM, Koro Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 15:44 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 10/13/2015 03:37 PM, Koro Chen wrote:
>>> The patch "ASoC: Prevent components from being bound to multiple cards"
>>> adds check to prevent multiple cards from using the same component.
>>> However, snd_soc_register_platform() or snd_soc_register_codec() will
>>> also create components, and sharing the same platform by multiple cards
>>> is then refused. This happens with a platform having multiple
>>> independent DAIs that share the same DMA controller.
>>>
>>> Relax the condition by checking component->registered_as_component,
>>> which is only true in case of snd_soc_register_component() and
>>> will be false for components created by snd_soc_register_platform()
>>> or snd_soc_register_codec().
>>
>> Binding a component to multiple cards results in internal data structure
>> corruption, regardless of whether it is a raw component, CODEC or platform,
>> which is why the check was added. So the proposed change wont work.
>>
> Thanks for your comment. Is it possible to share an example of how the
> data structure will be corrupted? So I can study into this further.
Just look at soc_probe_component() and think about what happens if that runs
twice for two different cards. Multiple calls to list_add() on the same
list, controls are added multiple times, DAPM widgets are created multiple
times, the card field will only point to the last card.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lars@metafoo.de (Lars-Peter Clausen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH] ASoC: Modify check condition of multiple bindings of components
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:42:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561D1843.1020007@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444745902.26493.2.camel@mtksdaap41>
On 10/13/2015 04:18 PM, Koro Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 15:44 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 10/13/2015 03:37 PM, Koro Chen wrote:
>>> The patch "ASoC: Prevent components from being bound to multiple cards"
>>> adds check to prevent multiple cards from using the same component.
>>> However, snd_soc_register_platform() or snd_soc_register_codec() will
>>> also create components, and sharing the same platform by multiple cards
>>> is then refused. This happens with a platform having multiple
>>> independent DAIs that share the same DMA controller.
>>>
>>> Relax the condition by checking component->registered_as_component,
>>> which is only true in case of snd_soc_register_component() and
>>> will be false for components created by snd_soc_register_platform()
>>> or snd_soc_register_codec().
>>
>> Binding a component to multiple cards results in internal data structure
>> corruption, regardless of whether it is a raw component, CODEC or platform,
>> which is why the check was added. So the proposed change wont work.
>>
> Thanks for your comment. Is it possible to share an example of how the
> data structure will be corrupted? So I can study into this further.
Just look at soc_probe_component() and think about what happens if that runs
twice for two different cards. Multiple calls to list_add() on the same
list, controls are added multiple times, DAPM widgets are created multiple
times, the card field will only point to the last card.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-13 13:37 [RFC PATCH] ASoC: Modify check condition of multiple bindings of components Koro Chen
2015-10-13 13:37 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-13 13:37 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-13 13:44 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-10-13 13:44 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-10-13 14:18 ` [alsa-devel] " Koro Chen
2015-10-13 14:18 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-13 14:18 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-13 14:42 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2015-10-13 14:42 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-10-14 1:19 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-14 1:19 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-14 1:19 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-14 9:00 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-10-14 9:00 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-10-15 12:10 ` Mark Brown
2015-10-15 12:10 ` Mark Brown
2015-10-15 12:49 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-15 12:49 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-15 12:49 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-15 13:26 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-10-15 13:26 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-10-16 2:31 ` Koro Chen
2015-10-16 2:31 ` [alsa-devel] " Koro Chen
2015-10-16 2:31 ` Koro Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561D1843.1020007@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=koro.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.