From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 00/36] asynchronous ALUA device handler
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:07:42 -0700
Message-ID: <561D1E3E.5030201@sandisk.com>
References: <1443523658-87622-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
 <560AD88B.9050902@sandisk.com> <560BE1DC.9060600@suse.de>
 <560C5509.6050206@sandisk.com> <561CD294.3080905@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bn1bon0060.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.60]:19264
	"EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752843AbbJMPHt (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:07:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <561CD294.3080905@suse.de>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

On 10/13/2015 02:44 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> I have rebased my patches to 4.3.0-rc5 and didn't see any lockups;
> tested with hpsa and lpfc, both mq enabled and disabled.
>
> Can you check if it's specific to ib_srp? Is there a way to simulate
> an ib_srp setup?

Hello Hannes,

This infinite loop was due to the scsi_dh_alua handler not being loaded 
during my test (as mentioned in 
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org/msg42645.html).

Bart.