From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 00/36] asynchronous ALUA device handler Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:13:01 +0200 Message-ID: <561D1F7D.7070803@suse.de> References: <1443523658-87622-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <560AD88B.9050902@sandisk.com> <560BE1DC.9060600@suse.de> <560C5509.6050206@sandisk.com> <561CD294.3080905@suse.de> <561D1E3E.5030201@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35871 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753065AbbJMPND (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:13:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <561D1E3E.5030201@sandisk.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche , James Bottomley Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Ewan Milne , "Martin K. Petersen" On 10/13/2015 05:07 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 10/13/2015 02:44 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> I have rebased my patches to 4.3.0-rc5 and didn't see any lockups; >> tested with hpsa and lpfc, both mq enabled and disabled. >> >> Can you check if it's specific to ib_srp? Is there a way to simulate >> an ib_srp setup? >=20 > Hello Hannes, >=20 > This infinite loop was due to the scsi_dh_alua handler not being > loaded during my test (as mentioned in > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org/msg42645.html= ). >=20 So it works with that patch? Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg GF: F. Imend=C3=B6rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG N=C3=BCrnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html