From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Garry Subject: Re: SSP frame iu defines Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:17:32 +0100 Message-ID: <561D3CAC.7080305@huawei.com> References: <56167B0D.5040303@huawei.com> <5172892.J8LUuCdX1I@wuerfel> <56168208.2020404@huawei.com> <1444661720.2205.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:52921 "EHLO szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932421AbbJMR2H (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:28:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1444661720.2205.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Arnd Bergmann , michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de, zhangfei , john.garry2@mail.dcu.ie, "xuwei (O)" >> OK, can I put this together. >> I feel that the code may get messy due to byte-ordering difference in >> isci versions. > > That's why we develop with the show me the code model. Rather than > arguing theoretically about whether something should or should not be > done, you propose the actual change. If it looks like a dog's breakfast > and all attempts to clean it up fail, chances are it's a bad change and > it won't go in. However, if it looks good, chances are it will. > > James > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > . > There is a patch for this in "[PATCH 01/25] [SCSI] sas: centralise ssp frame information units". Thanks, John