From: Janusz <januszmk6@gmail.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: edk2-devel@ml01.01.org, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] KVM: MTRR: fix memory type handling if MTRR is completely disabled
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:21:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561F53FD.7070303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561F516D.7070504@linux.intel.com>
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 09:10, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
>
> On 10/15/2015 02:58 PM, Janusz wrote:
>> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 08:41, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/15/2015 02:19 PM, Janusz wrote:
>>>> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 06:19, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, the bug may be not in KVM. When this bug happened, i saw OVMF
>>>>> only checked 1 CPU out, there is the log from OVMF's debug input:
>>>>>
>>>>> Flushing GCD
>>>>> Flushing GCD
>>>>> Flushing GCD
>>>>> Flushing GCD
>>>>> Flushing GCD
>>>>> Flushing GCD
>>>>> Flushing GCD
>>>>> Flushing GCD
>>>>> Flushing GCD
>>>>> Flushing GCDs
>>>>> Detect CPU count: 1
>>>>>
>>>>> So that the startup code has been freed however the APs are still
>>>>> running,
>>>>> i think that why we saw the vCPUs executed on unexpected address.
>>>>>
>>>>> After digging into OVMF's code, i noticed that BSP CPU waits for APs
>>>>> for a fixed timer period, however, KVM recent changes require zap all
>>>>> mappings if CR0.CD is changed, that means the APs need more time to
>>>>> startup.
>>>>>
>>>>> After following changes to OVMF, the bug is completely gone on my
>>>>> side:
>>>>>
>>>>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/ApStartup.c
>>>>> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/ApStartup.c
>>>>> @@ -454,7 +454,9 @@ StartApsStackless (
>>>>> //
>>>>> // Wait 100 milliseconds for APs to arrive at the ApEntryPoint
>>>>> routine
>>>>> //
>>>>> - MicroSecondDelay (100 * 1000);
>>>>> + MicroSecondDelay (10 * 100 * 1000);
>>>>>
>>>>> return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Janusz, could you please check this instead? You can switch to your
>>>>> previous kernel to do this test.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Ok, now first time when I started VM I was able to start system
>>>> successfully. When I turned it off and started it again, it
>>>> restarted my
>>>> vm at system boot couple of times. Sometimes I also get very high cpu
>>>> usage for no reason. Also, I get less fps in GTA 5 than in kernel
>>>> 4.1, I
>>>> get something like 30-55, but on 4.1 I get all the time 60 fps.
>>>> This is
>>>> my new log: https://bpaste.net/show/61a122ad7fe5
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just confirm: the Qemu internal error did not appear any more, right?
>> Yes, when I reverted your first patch, switched to -vga std from -vga
>> none and didn't passthrough my GPU (case when I got this internal
>> error), vm started without problem. I even didn't get any VM restarts
>> like with passthrough
>>
>
> Wow, it seems we have fixed the QEMU internal error now. :)
>
> Recurrently, Paolo has reverted some MTRR patches, was your test
> based on these reverted patches?
>
> The GPU passthrough issue may be related to vfio (not sure), Alex, do
> you have any idea?
>
> Laszlo, could you please check the root case is reasonable and fix it in
> OVMF if it's right?
>
> BTW, OVMF handles #UD with no trace - nothing is killed, and no call
> trace
> in the debug input...
>
Yes, reverted MTRR code is already in kernel I use - 4.3-r5+
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-15 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-18 9:37 [edk2] KVM: MTRR: fix memory type handling if MTRR is completely disabled Janusz
2015-09-18 10:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-18 17:48 ` Janusz
2015-09-21 2:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-09-21 3:30 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-09-21 3:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-01 14:12 ` Janusz
2015-10-01 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-02 14:38 ` Janusz
2015-10-10 20:07 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-12 18:20 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-12 18:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 3:58 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 7:37 ` Janusz
2015-10-14 8:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 8:32 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 9:13 ` Janusz
2015-10-14 9:16 ` Janusz
2015-10-14 9:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-15 3:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 18:08 ` Janusz
2015-10-15 4:19 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15 6:19 ` Janusz
2015-10-15 6:41 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15 6:58 ` Janusz
2015-10-15 7:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15 7:21 ` Janusz [this message]
2015-10-15 16:18 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-15 16:53 ` Kinney, Michael D
2015-10-15 18:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-20 17:27 ` Janusz
2015-10-20 17:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-20 18:52 ` Janusz Mocek
[not found] ` <5620696F.7050406@linux.intel.com>
2015-10-16 18:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-21 8:23 ` Janusz
2015-09-22 8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-22 10:29 ` Janusz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561F53FD.7070303@gmail.com \
--to=januszmk6@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=edk2-devel@ml01.01.org \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.