From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
To: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:36:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561F9DD4.3070906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2023832B7@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 10/15/2015 03:10 PM, Mcnamara, John wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Panu Matilainen
>> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:49 PM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n
>>
>> The number of memory channels is a truly obscure thing as a mandatory
>> command line argument when its really just an optimization.
>> Provide a reasonable default in mempool as suggested by Bruce Richardson
>> and make the -n argument optional in EAL to make DPDK that little bit
>> easier to use for a first-timer.
>
> Hi,
>
> In the Linux and FreeBSD user guides there is the following statement that will
> need to change as well, either as part of this patchset, or separately:
>
> "The -c and the -n options are mandatory; the others are optional."
>
> http://www.dpdk.org/doc/guides/linux_gsg/build_sample_apps.html#running-a-sample-application
> http://www.dpdk.org/doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_sample_apps.html#running-a-sample-application
Sure. I was planning on going through the docs and updating them
(separately) if the change is otherwise accepted, I suspect there are
more than those two places needing changes.
- Panu -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-15 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 10:22 [PATCH] eal: default to one memory channel if not specified Panu Matilainen
2015-10-14 11:45 ` David Marchand
2015-10-14 12:04 ` Panu Matilainen
2015-10-14 13:05 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-10-15 11:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n Panu Matilainen
2015-10-15 11:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] mempool: use a better default for number of memory channels Panu Matilainen
2015-10-15 11:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] eal: make the -n argument optional Panu Matilainen
2015-10-15 12:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n David Marchand
2015-10-26 16:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-15 12:10 ` Mcnamara, John
2015-10-15 12:36 ` Panu Matilainen [this message]
2015-10-15 13:12 ` Mcnamara, John
2015-10-26 16:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-26 16:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-27 7:19 ` Panu Matilainen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561F9DD4.3070906@redhat.com \
--to=pmatilai@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.