From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiann-Ming Su Subject: Re: ip_conntrack_max vs ip_conntrack Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:48:16 -0400 Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <561dc3260409301548488b387e@mail.gmail.com> References: <561dc32604092710524f3a8b5b@mail.gmail.com> <1096311443.1079.11.camel@nostromo.bgsecm.com> Reply-To: Jiann-Ming Su Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1096311443.1079.11.camel@nostromo.bgsecm.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "netfilter@lists.netfilter.org" On 27 Sep 2004 20:57:24 +0200, Jose Maria Lopez wrote: > > For the limit match look at: > iptables -m limit --help > > There's some good info on what I was looking for at the end of this section: http://www.iptables.org/documentation/HOWTO//packet-filtering-HOWTO-7.html#ss7.3 Does the limit option work on a per connection basis? Or, does one attacker's syn flood cause everybody to be limited as well? -- Jiann-Ming Su "I have to decide between two equally frightening options. If I wanted to do that, I'd vote." --Duckman