All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <56205C57.3070406@osg.samsung.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 8af46bc..4243b55 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 On 10/15/2015 05:02 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
-> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
+> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
 >> On 10/15/2015 05:00 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
 >>> On 10/15/2015 04:07 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
->>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
+>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
 >>>>> On 10/15/2015 12:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
->>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
+>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
 >>>>>>> On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
 >>>>>>>> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390
 >>>>>>>> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers).
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ On 10/15/2015 05:02 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
 >>>>>>>> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in
 >>>>>>>> the test.
 >>>>>>>>
->>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
+>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
 >>>>>>>> ---
 >>>>>>>> v3:
 >>>>>>>>  - correctly set syscall number on native arm64.
@@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ Shuah Khan
 Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
 Open Source Innovation Group
 Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
-shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org | (970) 217-8978
+shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 1a7a3ee..d2646d7 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,27 +6,26 @@
  "ref\056203023.2060007@osg.samsung.com\0"
  "ref\05620304C.3070701@osg.samsung.com\0"
  "ref\0CAGXu5jLsYyXxQNbPKVsdzfSbbgddpJiz2MzgwEdbLd7mhjDmxw@mail.gmail.com\0"
- "ref\0CAGXu5jLsYyXxQNbPKVsdzfSbbgddpJiz2MzgwEdbLd7mhjDmxw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Shuah Khan <shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "From\0Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:09:27 -0600\0"
- "To\0Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Cc\0AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>"
-  Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
-  Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>
-  Will Drewry <wad-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
-  Linux API <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
-  LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
- " Shuah Khan <shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "To\0Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>"
+  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
+  Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
+  Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
+  Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
+  LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+ " Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 10/15/2015 05:02 PM, Kees Cook wrote:\n"
- "> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n"
+ "> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:\n"
  ">> On 10/15/2015 05:00 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:\n"
  ">>> On 10/15/2015 04:07 PM, Kees Cook wrote:\n"
- ">>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n"
+ ">>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:\n"
  ">>>>> On 10/15/2015 12:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote:\n"
- ">>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n"
+ ">>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:\n"
  ">>>>>>> On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:\n"
  ">>>>>>>> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390\n"
  ">>>>>>>> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers).\n"
@@ -35,7 +34,7 @@
  ">>>>>>>> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in\n"
  ">>>>>>>> the test.\n"
  ">>>>>>>>\n"
- ">>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>\n"
+ ">>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>\n"
  ">>>>>>>> ---\n"
  ">>>>>>>> v3:\n"
  ">>>>>>>>  - correctly set syscall number on native arm64.\n"
@@ -75,6 +74,6 @@
  "Sr. Linux Kernel Developer\n"
  "Open Source Innovation Group\n"
  "Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)\n"
- shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org | (970) 217-8978
+ shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
 
-1412168f8942099928b3ba889bc9d5ce5b424f5f9a1fee214980979c55faf98f
+582116a3b5890d821ba2646921fe5a53064171d1a11306e9e96b915e33f70372

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.