From: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"vdavydov@parallels.com" <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
"rientjes@google.com" <rientjes@google.com>,
Lizefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
"lqymgt@gmail.com" <lqymgt@gmail.com>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>, "bp@suse.de" <bp@suse.de>,
"boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
"imammedo@redhat.com" <imammedo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] kernel OOPS at kmem_cache_alloc_node() because of smp_processor_id()
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:49:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562073D0.8070609@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1510150935171.21270@east.gentwo.org>
On 2015/10/15 22:39, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>
>> [ 0.016000] Call Trace:
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff810061dc>] dump_trace+0x6c/0x2d0
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff81394288>] dump_stack+0x69/0x71
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff81394308>] panic+0x78/0x199
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff81050fff>] do_exit+0x26f/0x360
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff813980a1>] oops_end+0xe1/0xf0
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff8102d955>] __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x155/0x230
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff813972ef>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff810ed93f>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0xbf/0x140
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff811dc176>] alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x16/0x70
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff81019888>] native_send_call_func_ipi+0x18/0xf0
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff810783ee>] smp_call_function_many+0x1ae/0x250
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff810784b0>] smp_call_function+0x20/0x30
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff8101580a>] set_mtrr+0x5a/0x140
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff8138ef17>] smp_callin+0xf0/0x1b4
>> [ 0.016000] [<ffffffff8138efe9>] start_secondary+0xe/0xb5
>
> This happened during IPI processing?
>
>> crash> p cache_cache
>
> Arg. This is the SLAB allocator. You cannot enable debugging without
> rebuilding the kernel with CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG.
>
>> smp_processor_id() return 14, the CPU14, but the CPU14 is *stuck*, so cache=
>> p->array[14] is NULL,
>> why did this situation happen? And cause NULL pointer accessing? Is this a =
>> kernel bug?
>
> Its likely a bug in some obscure code in a driver that corrupted memory or
> messed up the way memory was handled. set_mtrr()? What was going on at the
> time? A special graphics driver being loaded? That could cause issues.
>
It seems that the problem was fixed by Igor, right?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/6/257
Cced Igor Mammedov.
Regards,
-Gonglei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-16 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-15 12:16 [BUG?] kernel OOPS at kmem_cache_alloc_node() because of smp_processor_id() Gonglei (Arei)
2015-10-15 13:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-15 14:26 ` Gonglei
2015-10-15 14:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-16 3:49 ` Gonglei [this message]
2015-10-16 8:08 ` Igor Mammedov
2015-10-16 8:56 ` Gonglei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562073D0.8070609@huawei.com \
--to=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=lqymgt@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.