From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:51:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5620BAA5.5010807@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5620AF64.4050208@unitn.it>
Hi,
On 16/10/15 09:03, Luca Abeni wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 06:40 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> On 15/10/15 12:09, Luca Abeni wrote:
>>> Commit 9d5142624256 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by
>>> eliminating locking of non-feasible target") broke select_task_rq_dl()
> [...]
>>> - dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline,
>>> - cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr))
>>> + (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline,
>>> + cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr) ||
>>> + (cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr == 0)))
>>
>> Can't we actually use dl.dl_nr_running here and below, so
>> that we won't incur any wraparound problem?
> Ok, I tested the patch with dl.dl_nr_running and if works for me...
>
> I am going to send the updated patch in few minutes.
>
Thanks!
> BTW, should we also use "dl_rq->dl_nr_running == 0" instead of
> "dl_rq->earliest_dl.curr == 0" in inc_dl_deadline(), and remove the
> comment from init_dl_rq()? If you think it is a good idea, I'll test this
> additional change and send a patch in next week.
>
Yeah, it seems we need that fix too.
Best,
- Juri
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-16 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-15 11:09 [PATCH] Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks Luca Abeni
2015-10-15 16:40 ` Juri Lelli
2015-10-15 20:10 ` Luca Abeni
2015-10-16 8:03 ` Luca Abeni
2015-10-16 8:51 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5620BAA5.5010807@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.