All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x11vnc: move recipe to meta-oe
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:41:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56211AC3.5020307@mlbassoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKobJGbJ+ASvNqQ7Td1a28fyqXrn2idBKjZ-NCZoxj9Vsw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2015-10-16 09:29, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
>> On 2015-10-16 08:44, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 08:40:10AM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2015-10-16 08:25, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> x11vnc can be configured with --use-system-libvncserver to use an
>>>>> external libvncserver which will be added to meta-oe. Since oe-core
>>>>> should not depend on meta-oe, we move x11vnc there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@ni.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just curious why not the other way - move libvncserver to OE-core?
>>>> x11vnc seems like one of the very few [and useful] X based tools that
>>>> are present in OE-core that it seems like a huge step backwards to
>>>> move it out.
>>>
>>>
>>> It was discussed in "[OE-core] [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] meta-oe:
>>> recipes-graphics: add libvncserver recipe" thread and I agree with
>>> Otavio that x11vnc doesn't look so fundamental component used by most
>>> embedded builds to deserver being in the core.
>>
>> Well, I tend to disagree and I don't think there has really been a
>> discussion - only one "no" (Otavio) and one "I don't know" (Paul).
>
> The recipe being in meta-oe, can be used anyway. It is just out of OE-Core.
>
> Anyway, what x11vnc has to provide to a core system? it even requires
> X11 which a lot of embedded systems are moving away from...
>

Maybe for you, but not my customers - most of them insist on it.

Yes, x11nvc in meta-oe is an answer, but I don't want to have to
drag in meta-oe (way too heavy for my tastes) just to be able to
use it (I use it all the time to debug customer systems that I only
have remote access to)...

Maybe we should abandon Python or GDB (server) from OE-core as they
aren't used by all systems either??

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-16 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-16 14:25 [PATCH] x11vnc: move recipe to meta-oe Ioan-Adrian Ratiu
2015-10-16 14:40 ` Gary Thomas
2015-10-16 14:44   ` Martin Jansa
2015-10-16 15:21     ` Gary Thomas
2015-10-16 15:29       ` Otavio Salvador
2015-10-16 15:41         ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2015-10-16 15:48           ` Otavio Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56211AC3.5020307@mlbassoc.com \
    --to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.