From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD boot
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:02:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562505FD.2060207@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5624D080.9080009@writeme.com>
On 10/19/2015 04:14 AM, Sinan Akman wrote:
>
> Hi Yuan
>
> On 19/10/15 05:21 AM, Yao Yuan wrote:
>> Hi Sinan Akman,
>>
>> Yes, I mean the Rev 1.0 silicon.
>> Sorry, I can't guarantee that there aren't any boards with Rev1.0 silicon are in user's hands.
>> Because we have also delivery very little board with Rev1.0 silicon to customer or developer for developing, assessing and verifying in the early stages.
>
> Thanks for the follow up on this, but I don't think that there were only
> very few rev1.0 boards delivered. These were the boards bought from
> distributor and during the time span of many weeks.
>
> I don't know the details and the impact of this patch exactly but
> if the patch will break any rev1.0 board I don't think this would be
> acceptable. There are definitely enough number of rev1.0 boards
> made generally available (not specifically for early adapters etc)
> that we should not break u-boot running on them.
>
>> Also we haven't support Rev1.0 in our SDK now.
>
> Sorry, but this is a bit irrelevant here. I'd expect u-boot mainline
> does not necessarily follow what your SDK stops supporting. If
> u-boot supported rev1.0 boards and if there are still many of
> them out there I see no reason to break this.
>
Yuan,
Please test the patch on rev 1.0 SoC and make changes if needed. This feature
has been disabled for rev 1.0.
York
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 7:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD boot Yuan Yao
2015-10-14 21:21 ` York Sun
2015-10-15 7:55 ` Yao Yuan
2015-10-15 16:40 ` York Sun
2015-10-15 19:37 ` Sinan Akman
2015-10-19 9:21 ` Yao Yuan
2015-10-19 11:14 ` Sinan Akman
2015-10-19 15:02 ` York Sun [this message]
2015-10-21 3:59 ` Yao Yuan
2015-10-21 5:37 ` York Sun
2015-10-30 16:21 ` York Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562505FD.2060207@freescale.com \
--to=yorksun@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.