All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: "Izumi, Taku" <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Kamezawa, Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"mel@csn.ul.ie" <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"dave.hansen@intel.com" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"matt@codeblueprint.co.uk" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:42:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56259BFF.1090203@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E86EADE93E2D054CBCD4E708C38D364A5427FECE@G01JPEXMBYT01>

On 2015/10/20 8:34, Izumi, Taku wrote:

>  Hi Xishi,
> 
>> On 2015/10/15 21:32, Taku Izumi wrote:
>>
>>> Xeon E7 v3 based systems supports Address Range Mirroring
>>> and UEFI BIOS complied with UEFI spec 2.5 can notify which
>>> ranges are reliable (mirrored) via EFI memory map.
>>> Now Linux kernel utilize its information and allocates
>>> boot time memory from reliable region.
>>>
>>> My requirement is:
>>>   - allocate kernel memory from reliable region
>>>   - allocate user memory from non-reliable region
>>>
>>> In order to meet my requirement, ZONE_MOVABLE is useful.
>>> By arranging non-reliable range into ZONE_MOVABLE,
>>> reliable memory is only used for kernel allocations.
>>>
>>> This patch extends existing "kernelcore" option and
>>> introduces kernelcore=reliable option. By specifying
>>> "reliable" instead of specifying the amount of memory,
>>> non-reliable region will be arranged into ZONE_MOVABLE.
>>>
>>> Earlier discussion is at:
>>>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/9/24
>>>
>>
>> Hi Taku,
>>
>> If user don't want to waste a lot of memory, and he only set
>> a few memory to mirrored memory, then the kernelcore is very
>> small, right? That means OS will have a very small normal zone
>> and a very large movable zone.
> 
>  Right.
> 
>> Kernel allocation could only use the unmovable zone. As the
>> normal zone is very small, the kernel allocation maybe OOM,
>> right?
> 
>  Right.
> 
>> Do you mean that we will reuse the movable zone in short-term
>> solution and create a new zone(mirrored zone) in future?
> 
>  If there is that kind of requirements, I don't oppose 
>  creating a new zone.
> 

As far as I know, some apps(e.g. date base) maybe could only use
the normal zone.

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

>  Sincerely,
>  Taku Izumi
> 
> .
> 



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: "Izumi, Taku" <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Kamezawa, Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"mel@csn.ul.ie" <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"dave.hansen@intel.com" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"matt@codeblueprint.co.uk" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:42:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56259BFF.1090203@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E86EADE93E2D054CBCD4E708C38D364A5427FECE@G01JPEXMBYT01>

On 2015/10/20 8:34, Izumi, Taku wrote:

>  Hi Xishi,
> 
>> On 2015/10/15 21:32, Taku Izumi wrote:
>>
>>> Xeon E7 v3 based systems supports Address Range Mirroring
>>> and UEFI BIOS complied with UEFI spec 2.5 can notify which
>>> ranges are reliable (mirrored) via EFI memory map.
>>> Now Linux kernel utilize its information and allocates
>>> boot time memory from reliable region.
>>>
>>> My requirement is:
>>>   - allocate kernel memory from reliable region
>>>   - allocate user memory from non-reliable region
>>>
>>> In order to meet my requirement, ZONE_MOVABLE is useful.
>>> By arranging non-reliable range into ZONE_MOVABLE,
>>> reliable memory is only used for kernel allocations.
>>>
>>> This patch extends existing "kernelcore" option and
>>> introduces kernelcore=reliable option. By specifying
>>> "reliable" instead of specifying the amount of memory,
>>> non-reliable region will be arranged into ZONE_MOVABLE.
>>>
>>> Earlier discussion is at:
>>>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/9/24
>>>
>>
>> Hi Taku,
>>
>> If user don't want to waste a lot of memory, and he only set
>> a few memory to mirrored memory, then the kernelcore is very
>> small, right? That means OS will have a very small normal zone
>> and a very large movable zone.
> 
>  Right.
> 
>> Kernel allocation could only use the unmovable zone. As the
>> normal zone is very small, the kernel allocation maybe OOM,
>> right?
> 
>  Right.
> 
>> Do you mean that we will reuse the movable zone in short-term
>> solution and create a new zone(mirrored zone) in future?
> 
>  If there is that kind of requirements, I don't oppose 
>  creating a new zone.
> 

As far as I know, some apps(e.g. date base) maybe could only use
the normal zone.

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

>  Sincerely,
>  Taku Izumi
> 
> .
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-20  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-15 13:32 [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Taku Izumi
2015-10-15 13:32 ` Taku Izumi
2015-10-19  2:25 ` Xishi Qiu
2015-10-19  2:25   ` Xishi Qiu
2015-10-20  0:34   ` Izumi, Taku
2015-10-20  0:34     ` Izumi, Taku
2015-10-20  1:42     ` Xishi Qiu [this message]
2015-10-20  1:42       ` Xishi Qiu
2015-10-21 18:17 ` Luck, Tony
2015-10-21 18:17   ` Luck, Tony
2015-10-22 10:02   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-22 10:02     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-22 23:26     ` Luck, Tony
2015-10-23  1:01       ` Izumi, Taku
2015-10-23  1:01         ` Izumi, Taku
2015-10-23  1:44         ` Luck, Tony
2015-10-23  1:44           ` Luck, Tony
2015-10-30  6:19           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-30  6:19             ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-30 19:42             ` Luck, Tony
2015-10-30 19:42               ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-04  6:56               ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-11-04  6:56                 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-23  3:36 ` Xishi Qiu
2015-10-23  3:36   ` Xishi Qiu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56259BFF.1090203@huawei.com \
    --to=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.