From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] x86/mm: override stored file names for multiply built sources Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:44:28 +0100 Message-ID: <5626372C.6040308@citrix.com> References: <5626340902000078000ACB1F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <562635FC02000078000ACB35@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoWHN-0002of-5N for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 12:44:37 +0000 In-Reply-To: <562635FC02000078000ACB35@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel Cc: George Dunlap , Tim Deegan , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 20/10/15 11:39, Jan Beulich wrote: > To make it possible to tell apart the static symbols therein, use their > object file names instead of their source ones. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich In principle, a very good idea. Is it perhaps worth having the build runes pass in a -D value instead, so as to avoid the .file reference getting stale? > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/guest_walk.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/guest_walk.c > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ > #include > #include > > +/* Allow uniquely identifying static symbols in the 3 generated objects. */ > +asm(".file \"guest_walk_" __stringify(GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS) ".o\""); You should probably have a semicolon or newline at the end, to avoid interacting with whatever the next directive the compiler chooses to emit is. ~Andrew