From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 0445FE008AE; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:55:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp206.alice.it (smtp206.alice.it [82.57.200.102]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E86BE00843 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caronte.home.webthatworks.it (87.9.24.216) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 56139B83029360F6 for meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:55:45 +0200 Received: from gloom.home.webthatworks.it (gloom.home.webthatworks.it [192.168.1.14]) by caronte.home.webthatworks.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAB16FE032F for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gloom.home.webthatworks.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33125E01F3 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:54:43 +0200 (CEST) To: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" From: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo Organization: http://www.WebThatWorks.it Message-ID: <5626C633.7040503@webthatworks.it> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:54:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: from where to start to port some patches to a newer kernel X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:55:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm playing with an imx28evk based board. The manufacturer supports just the old freescale kernel and and I have their layer to make it work in Yocto. They didn't define a new board, they just patched the bsp of imx28evk. I'd like to get an idea about how hard it could be to port those patches to a newer kernel. Which kernel would you suggest? What procedure do you suggest to set up a dev environment that will let me try start hacking easily? I was thinking about: * creating a copy of their layer, getting rid of their kernel patches * uncomment PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-fslc" and PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-fslc = "3.%" in local.conf * build image-core-minimal * start to add their ported patch back in the copy of their layer. Hoping that once I start they will join. thanks -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it