From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dv@pseudoterminal.org>
Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118)
	id 3EA6AE00708; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	yocto-www.yoctoproject.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
	* -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	*      [score: 0.0000]
Received: from ptmx.org (ptmx.org [178.63.28.110])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371F9E006D5
	for <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>;
	Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.14] (chello062178118086.5.14.vie.surfer.at
	[62.178.118.86]) by ptmx.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1E2623245;
	Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:25:10 +0200 (CEST)
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br>
References: <562543CC.5040705@pseudoterminal.org>
	<CAP9ODKq=rVxC-HN0+-LWv5b5mZEpkAh-_x1F+RdB57fds18syg@mail.gmail.com>
	<56254D6E.4070409@pseudoterminal.org>
	<CAP9ODKqDbBrZWEah6q2tq0WGmErYU+fSfwSCTydW+PtEWhoggw@mail.gmail.com>
	<56273EE6.90307@pseudoterminal.org>
	<CAP9ODKqZ_o80_aoSGc2p7kxvMgc53MiMTfbSuOujd3XpAGc0Qw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5627D27A.5060704@pseudoterminal.org>
	<B90D4A69E51C7D01.9DDAE539-8361-4AF1-A55F-713D20C65464@mail.outlook.com>
	<5627D556.4010505@pseudoterminal.org>
	<CAP9ODKq0a_-pG_YFWEFpmj94dDw5gATyjZBbH06QvXrMb2oTyQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Carlos Rafael Giani <dv@pseudoterminal.org>
Message-ID: <5627D886.1060701@pseudoterminal.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:25:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKq0a_-pG_YFWEFpmj94dDw5gATyjZBbH06QvXrMb2oTyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>,
	Sundararaj Prabhu <Prabhu.Sundararaj@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm-extra] errors while building boundary kernel 3.14.28
X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers
	<meta-freescale.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale>
List-Post: <mailto:meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:25:19 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Am 2015-10-21 um 20:21 schrieb Otavio Salvador:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani
> <dv@pseudoterminal.org> wrote:
>> Ah, found it. Something else is missing from the kernel.
>>
>> galcore: Unknown symbol v7_dma_flush_range (err 0)
>> galcore: Unknown symbol v7_dma_map_area (err 0)
>> galcore: Unknown symbol v7_dma_flush_range (err 0)
>>
>> I recall that these symbols have to be exposed explcitely, because they
>> aren't exposed by default.
> This was the first patch I pointed you to apply.
>

The strange thing is that this *is* applied already. I am checking if 
perhaps for some reason MULTI_CACHE is defined.