From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Gmail thinks most alsa-devel mail is spam
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:43:12 +0200
Message-ID: <56289390.40902@perex.cz>
References: <5627833D.8020908@tabi.org>
 <CAG5mAdyivbfwi1JBwHdu+c89j0GkE0Cux+eww7+SnAvUTkCPug@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOZdJXXWDuU=Rk03KwixpFu1LYYX8Kzaq6q-wu-rA9uGTvHSWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA+gEbYUaJcJ+qHskBfCd79JLEmjexhmMPGQE27i-sydOZgugA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA+gEbaUQEm0HAKNs7t=aXSt6X7KOPnsdSTAhGRoVAq89J3WGw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mail1.perex.cz (mail1.perex.cz [77.48.224.245])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD282606F9
 for <Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:43:13 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <CAA+gEbaUQEm0HAKNs7t=aXSt6X7KOPnsdSTAhGRoVAq89J3WGw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: "A. C. Censi" <accensi@gmail.com>, ALSA development <Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

Dne 22.10.2015 v 03:55 A. C. Censi napsal(a):

> I have the same problem and not only with gmail, but my company server does
> the same check
> 
> Probably the misclassification is due to:
> 
> - Keep valid reverse DNS records for the IP address(es) from which you send
> mail, pointing to your domain.

> Received: from alsa0.perex.cz ([2002:4d30:e0f1:1:5054:ff:fe8b:a8f0])

OK. The outgoing e-mails should be from IPv4 now which has registered
reverse DNS record. You may check.

					Jaroslav

-- 
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.