From: Robert Shearman <rshearma@brocade.com>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] mpls: multipath route support
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:24:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5628B94A.5010903@brocade.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445217645-42885-2-git-send-email-roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
On 19/10/15 02:20, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> @@ -159,6 +137,7 @@ static int mpls_forward(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
> struct mpls_shim_hdr *hdr;
> struct mpls_route *rt;
> + struct mpls_nh *nh;
> struct mpls_entry_decoded dec;
> struct net_device *out_dev;
> struct mpls_dev *mdev;
> @@ -166,6 +145,7 @@ static int mpls_forward(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> unsigned int new_header_size;
> unsigned int mtu;
> int err;
> + int nhidx;
nhidx looks to be unused. Remove?
>
> /* Careful this entire function runs inside of an rcu critical section */
>
> @@ -196,8 +176,12 @@ static int mpls_forward(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> if (!rt)
> goto drop;
>
> + nh = mpls_select_multipath(rt);
> + if (!nh)
> + goto drop;
> +
> /* Find the output device */
> - out_dev = rcu_dereference(rt->rt_dev);
> + out_dev = rcu_dereference(nh->nh_dev);
> if (!mpls_output_possible(out_dev))
> goto drop;
>
> @@ -212,7 +196,7 @@ static int mpls_forward(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> dec.ttl -= 1;
>
> /* Verify the destination can hold the packet */
> - new_header_size = mpls_rt_header_size(rt);
> + new_header_size = mpls_nh_header_size(nh);
> mtu = mpls_dev_mtu(out_dev);
> if (mpls_pkt_too_big(skb, mtu - new_header_size))
> goto drop;
> @@ -240,13 +224,14 @@ static int mpls_forward(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> /* Push the new labels */
> hdr = mpls_hdr(skb);
> bos = dec.bos;
> - for (i = rt->rt_labels - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> - hdr[i] = mpls_entry_encode(rt->rt_label[i], dec.ttl, 0, bos);
> + for (i = nh->nh_labels - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + hdr[i] = mpls_entry_encode(nh->nh_label[i],
> + dec.ttl, 0, bos);
> bos = false;
> }
> }
>
> - err = neigh_xmit(rt->rt_via_table, out_dev, rt->rt_via, skb);
> + err = neigh_xmit(nh->nh_via_table, out_dev, nh->nh_via, skb);
> if (err)
> net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: packet transmission failed: %d\n",
> __func__, err);
> return dev;
> }
>
> +static int mpls_nh_assign_dev(struct net *net, struct mpls_nh *nh, int oif)
> +{
> + struct net_device *dev = NULL;
> + int err = -ENODEV;
> +
> + dev = find_outdev(net, nh, oif);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(dev);
> + dev = NULL;
> + goto errout;
> + }
> +
> + /* Ensure this is a supported device */
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + if (!mpls_dev_get(dev))
> + goto errout;
> +
> + /* For now just support ethernet devices */
> + if ((dev->type != ARPHRD_ETHER) && (dev->type != ARPHRD_LOOPBACK))
> + goto errout;
> +
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(nh->nh_dev, dev);
> + dev_put(dev);
If it's safe to not keep a reference to dev (i.e. because the device
cannot go away while a netlink message is being processed), then why not
just change find_outdev to use __dev_get_by_index? If the dev can go
away during this, then we could end up adding an mpls route that points
to a freed interface, because until we've added the route to the label
table mpls_ifdown won't find it.
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +errout:
> + if (dev)
> + dev_put(dev);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nla_get_labels);
>
> +int nla_get_via(const struct nlattr *nla, u8 *via_alen,
> + u8 *via_table, u8 via_addr[])
> +{
> + struct rtvia *via = nla_data(nla);
> + int err = -EINVAL;
> + u8 alen;
This should be an int to avoid nexthop address lengths > 255 wrapping
and possibly accepted instead of rejected.
> +
> + if (nla_len(nla) < offsetof(struct rtvia, rtvia_addr))
> + goto errout;
> + alen = nla_len(nla) -
> + offsetof(struct rtvia, rtvia_addr);
> + if (alen > MAX_VIA_ALEN)
> + goto errout;
> +
> + /* Validate the address family */
> + switch(via->rtvia_family) {
> + case AF_PACKET:
> + *via_table = NEIGH_LINK_TABLE;
> + break;
> + case AF_INET:
> + *via_table = NEIGH_ARP_TABLE;
> + if (alen != 4)
> + goto errout;
> + break;
> + case AF_INET6:
> + *via_table = NEIGH_ND_TABLE;
> + if (alen != 16)
> + goto errout;
> + break;
> + default:
> + /* Unsupported address family */
> + goto errout;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(via_addr, via->rtvia_addr, alen);
> + *via_alen = alen;
> + err = 0;
> +
> +errout:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int rtm_to_route_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> struct mpls_route_config *cfg)
> {
Otherwise, looks good.
Thanks,
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 1:20 [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] mpls: multipath route support Roopa Prabhu
2015-10-22 2:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-10-22 13:06 ` roopa
2015-10-22 10:24 ` Robert Shearman [this message]
2015-10-22 13:33 ` roopa
2015-10-22 13:48 ` Robert Shearman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5628B94A.5010903@brocade.com \
--to=rshearma@brocade.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.