From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm: fix a migrating irq bug when hotplug cpu
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:56:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5628C0DD.50900@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151022092629.GQ32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 2015/10/22 17:26, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:29:08PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Yang Yingliang
>>> <yangyingliang@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>> When cpu is disabled, all irqs will be migratged to another cpu.
>>>> In some cases, a new affinity is different, the old affinity need
>>>> to be updated and if irq_set_affinity's return value is IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE,
>>>> the old affinity can not be updated. Fix it by using irq_do_set_affinity.
>>>>
>>>> And migrating interrupts is a core code matter, so use the generic
>>>> function irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu() to migrate interrupts in
>>>> kernel/irq/migration.c.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>>>> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h | 1 -
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/irq.c | 62 ----------------------------------------------
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>>>> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> index 72ad724..bffba78 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -1492,6 +1492,7 @@ config NR_CPUS
>>>> config HOTPLUG_CPU
>>>> bool "Support for hot-pluggable CPUs"
>>>> depends on SMP
>>>> + select GENERIC_IRQ_MIGRATION
>>>
>>> This causes the following warnings during s2ram on r8a7791/koelsch
>>> (dual-core CA15):
>>
>> Thanks for the report. I'll see what tonight's boot run says for my
>> platforms. Hopefully, the author of these changes can help debug
>> this.
>
> What's happened is that:
>
> - c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
> - if (!c->irq_set_affinity)
> - pr_debug("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq);
>
> has become:
>
> + c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
> + if (!c->irq_set_affinity) {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq);
>
> which makes things more noisy.
>
> This is a change that was not described in the commit message for the
> patch Thomas merged.
I described it in v2 cover letter and kept the change history in v6
cover letter. There is no comment on the change when patch the was
reviewing in v2, so I thought it's ok and I kept the change in the
next versions.
Need I send a patch to the Thomas branch to revert the change ?
Thanks,
Yang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: yangyingliang@huawei.com (Yang Yingliang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm: fix a migrating irq bug when hotplug cpu
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:56:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5628C0DD.50900@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151022092629.GQ32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 2015/10/22 17:26, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:29:08PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Yang Yingliang
>>> <yangyingliang@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>> When cpu is disabled, all irqs will be migratged to another cpu.
>>>> In some cases, a new affinity is different, the old affinity need
>>>> to be updated and if irq_set_affinity's return value is IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE,
>>>> the old affinity can not be updated. Fix it by using irq_do_set_affinity.
>>>>
>>>> And migrating interrupts is a core code matter, so use the generic
>>>> function irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu() to migrate interrupts in
>>>> kernel/irq/migration.c.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>>>> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h | 1 -
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/irq.c | 62 ----------------------------------------------
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>>>> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> index 72ad724..bffba78 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -1492,6 +1492,7 @@ config NR_CPUS
>>>> config HOTPLUG_CPU
>>>> bool "Support for hot-pluggable CPUs"
>>>> depends on SMP
>>>> + select GENERIC_IRQ_MIGRATION
>>>
>>> This causes the following warnings during s2ram on r8a7791/koelsch
>>> (dual-core CA15):
>>
>> Thanks for the report. I'll see what tonight's boot run says for my
>> platforms. Hopefully, the author of these changes can help debug
>> this.
>
> What's happened is that:
>
> - c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
> - if (!c->irq_set_affinity)
> - pr_debug("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq);
>
> has become:
>
> + c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
> + if (!c->irq_set_affinity) {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq);
>
> which makes things more noisy.
>
> This is a change that was not described in the commit message for the
> patch Thomas merged.
I described it in v2 cover letter and kept the change history in v6
cover letter. There is no comment on the change when patch the was
reviewing in v2, so I thought it's ok and I kept the change in the
next versions.
Need I send a patch to the Thomas branch to revert the change ?
Thanks,
Yang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm: fix a migrating irq bug when hotplug cpu
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:56:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5628C0DD.50900@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151022092629.GQ32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 2015/10/22 17:26, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:29:08PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Yang Yingliang
>>> <yangyingliang@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>> When cpu is disabled, all irqs will be migratged to another cpu.
>>>> In some cases, a new affinity is different, the old affinity need
>>>> to be updated and if irq_set_affinity's return value is IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE,
>>>> the old affinity can not be updated. Fix it by using irq_do_set_affinity.
>>>>
>>>> And migrating interrupts is a core code matter, so use the generic
>>>> function irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu() to migrate interrupts in
>>>> kernel/irq/migration.c.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>>>> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h | 1 -
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/irq.c | 62 ----------------------------------------------
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>>>> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> index 72ad724..bffba78 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -1492,6 +1492,7 @@ config NR_CPUS
>>>> config HOTPLUG_CPU
>>>> bool "Support for hot-pluggable CPUs"
>>>> depends on SMP
>>>> + select GENERIC_IRQ_MIGRATION
>>>
>>> This causes the following warnings during s2ram on r8a7791/koelsch
>>> (dual-core CA15):
>>
>> Thanks for the report. I'll see what tonight's boot run says for my
>> platforms. Hopefully, the author of these changes can help debug
>> this.
>
> What's happened is that:
>
> - c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
> - if (!c->irq_set_affinity)
> - pr_debug("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq);
>
> has become:
>
> + c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
> + if (!c->irq_set_affinity) {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq);
>
> which makes things more noisy.
>
> This is a change that was not described in the commit message for the
> patch Thomas merged.
I described it in v2 cover letter and kept the change history in v6
cover letter. There is no comment on the change when patch the was
reviewing in v2, so I thought it's ok and I kept the change in the
next versions.
Need I send a patch to the Thomas branch to revert the change ?
Thanks,
Yang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-24 9:32 [RFC PATCH v6 0/3] arm/arm64: fix a migrating irq bug when hotplug cpu Yang Yingliang
2015-09-24 9:32 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-09-24 9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/3] genirq: introduce CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MIGRATION and kernel/irq/cpuhotplug.c Yang Yingliang
2015-09-24 9:32 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-10-01 14:18 ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: Introduce generic irq migration for cpu hotunplug tip-bot for Yang Yingliang
2015-10-01 14:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 14:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 14:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-01 14:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-24 9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/3] arm64: fix a migrating irq bug when hotplug cpu Yang Yingliang
2015-09-24 9:32 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-10-09 16:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-09 16:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-24 9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm: " Yang Yingliang
2015-09-24 9:32 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-10-13 19:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-13 19:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-21 11:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-21 11:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-21 11:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-21 20:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-21 20:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-21 20:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-22 9:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-22 9:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-22 9:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-22 9:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-22 9:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-22 9:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-22 10:56 ` Yang Yingliang [this message]
2015-10-22 10:56 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-10-22 10:56 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-10-22 11:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-22 11:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-22 11:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-22 12:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-22 12:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-22 12:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-22 16:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-22 16:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-22 16:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-15 6:59 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-12-15 6:59 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-12-15 6:59 ` Yang Yingliang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5628C0DD.50900@huawei.com \
--to=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.