From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:12:52 +0200
Subject: [Cocci] Request 339055 commented by jengelh (submit
 devel:tools/coccinelle)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1510221256380.5067@nerf40.vanv.qr>
References: <obs-request-339055@build.opensuse.org>
 <561ec27032c86_2e7132ba18787fc@build.opensuse.org>
 <20151014210450.GI14464@wotan.suse.de>
 <alpine.LSU.2.20.1510142311580.17133@nerf40.vanv.qr>
 <20151014212342.GK14464@wotan.suse.de>
 <alpine.LSU.2.20.1510150045200.18488@nerf40.vanv.qr>
 <562872D8.3060004@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.LSU.2.20.1510220948270.20948@nerf40.vanv.qr>
 <5628BB3A.1060204@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.LSU.2.20.1510221256380.5067@nerf40.vanv.qr>
Message-ID: <5628D2C4.10304@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

>> Are you interested in achieving progress on a topic like
>> 'Collateral evolution around "Automake"'?
>> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/41
> 
> Sort of.

I am curious if you would like to contribute a bit more help
for the affected design details.


> If a tarball ships configure, good for us. If it does not, well, then that
> means it will take a few seconds more to build and extra dependencies to be
> installed. For a build system, all of that is a no-brainer, but for "users", it
> can get annoying when they have to install, for example, half of the
> gnome-devel stack just to satisfy an m4 macro in case they have to rerun the
> configure generator.

Do you care which software versions were involved in the generation of the
preferred configuration script?

Regards,
Markus