From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>,
coreutils@gnu.org
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] copy, dd: simplify and optimize NUL bytes detection
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:44:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5628F634.6040809@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5628F4BC.2040502@redhat.com>
On 22/10/2015 16:37, Eric Blake wrote:
>> > + /* Check first 16 bytes manually. */
>> > + for (len = 0; len < 16; len++)
>> > + {
>> > + if (! bufsize)
>> > + return true;
>> > + if (*p)
>> > + return false;
>> > + p++;
>> > + bufsize--;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + /* Now we know that's zero, memcmp with self. */
>> > + return memcmp (buf, p, bufsize) == 0;
>> > }
> Cool trick of using a suitably-aligned overlap-to-self check to then
> trigger platform-specific speedups without having to rewrite them by
> hand! qemu is doing a similar check in util/cutils.c:buffer_is_zero()
> that could probably benefit from the same idea.
Nice trick indeed. On the other hand, the first 16 bytes are enough to
rule out 99.99% (number out of thin hair) of the non-zero blocks, so
that's where you want to optimize. Checking them an unsigned long at a
time, or fetching a few unsigned longs and ORing them together would
probably be the best of both worlds, because you then only use the FPU
in the rare case of a zero buffer.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1445522453-14450-1-git-send-email-P@draigBrady.com>
2015-10-22 14:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] copy, dd: simplify and optimize NUL bytes detection Eric Blake
2015-10-22 14:44 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-10-22 15:17 ` Pádraig Brady
2015-10-22 15:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-22 16:02 ` Eric Blake
2015-10-22 16:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-22 17:39 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-10-22 19:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-23 11:12 ` Pádraig Brady
2015-10-23 11:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-23 11:15 ` Pádraig Brady
2015-10-24 2:24 ` Pádraig Brady
2015-10-25 12:00 ` Pádraig Brady
2015-10-22 15:47 ` Bernhard Voelker
2015-10-22 15:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-22 15:55 ` Eric Blake
2015-10-23 10:59 ` Bernhard Voelker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5628F634.6040809@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=P@draigBrady.com \
--cc=coreutils@gnu.org \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.