From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Han Xu <b45815@freescale.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mtd: fsl-quadspi: Never build on SPARC
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:13:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5629899C.5040404@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151023010757.GI13239@google.com>
On 10/22/2015 06:07 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> + Han
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:31:46AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Attempts to build fsl-quadspi on SPARC fail with
>>
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c: In function 'fsl_qspi_init_lut':
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c:369:1: error:
>> 'LUT_0' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c:418:1: error:
>> pasting "LUT_" and "(" does not give a valid preprocessing token
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c:418:2: error:
>> implicit declaration of function 'LUT_'
>
> I don't think this is only a SPARC problem. The macro concatenation is
> generally suspect.
>
> I see that READ and WRITE are problems at least. If something like
> <linux/fs.h> gets included somehow, then these tokens resolve to
> integers or expressions before they fall through to literal
> concatentation, so we get 'LUT_0' or 'LUT_(1ULL << __REQ_WRITE)' instead
> of 'LUT_READ' and 'LUT_WRITE'.
>
You are right, that deserves a better fix. I'll leave it up to you.
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-21 14:31 [PATCH -next] mtd: fsl-quadspi: Never build on SPARC Guenter Roeck
2015-10-23 1:07 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-23 1:13 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-10-23 16:31 ` Han Xu
2015-10-23 16:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-23 16:55 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5629899C.5040404@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=b45815@freescale.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.