From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: rbd and the next firefly release v0.80.11 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:09:04 +0200 Message-ID: <562A93E0.8050402@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vsRVfJx9xOXciHSgH0wJ6pxIqeOH230Uf" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:49003 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751774AbbJWUJH (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:09:07 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Josh Durgin Cc: Ceph Development , Nathan Cutler This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vsRVfJx9xOXciHSgH0wJ6pxIqeOH230Uf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Josh, The next firefly release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/fi= refly passed the rbd suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#note-105= and http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#note-120). Do you think the fir= efly branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --vsRVfJx9xOXciHSgH0wJ6pxIqeOH230Uf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlYqk+AACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21R+gCgtqCYkGdW1yY0dKetbHqQ2IQW dCEAoINcTIGwJDEhLBWOHYJ3l1JJSOvC =aK5e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vsRVfJx9xOXciHSgH0wJ6pxIqeOH230Uf--