From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Subject: rgw and the next firefly release v0.80.11
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:10:30 +0200
Message-ID: <562A9436.7030709@dachary.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="vKXgFwSerCMg6u2IH3NgHM1OMm6UdxqRf"
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:49007 "EHLO
	smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751763AbbJWUKc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:10:32 -0400
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--vKXgFwSerCMg6u2IH3NgHM1OMm6UdxqRf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Yehuda,

The next firefly release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/fi=
refly passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#note-111=
). Do you think the firefly branch is ready for QE to start their own rou=
nd of testing ?

Cheers

--=20
Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
























--vKXgFwSerCMg6u2IH3NgHM1OMm6UdxqRf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlYqlDYACgkQ8dLMyEl6F2056QCfR9ddPpyGaCn/AyCkbH62/RdL
rsoAoJoV3rX7QrfvJBIzUHdYx7VNfwF9
=R278
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vKXgFwSerCMg6u2IH3NgHM1OMm6UdxqRf--