From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Subject: cephfs and the next firefly release v0.80.11
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:12:29 +0200
Message-ID: <562A94AD.8080004@dachary.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="5it43qgchpWgsN8eeb1vLEs1eECQIhRJV"
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:49013 "EHLO
	smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751225AbbJWUMb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:12:31 -0400
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--5it43qgchpWgsN8eeb1vLEs1eECQIhRJV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Greg,

The next firefly release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/fi=
refly passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#note-112)=
=2E Do you think the firefly branch is ready for QE to start their own ro=
und of testing ?

Cheers

--=20
Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


























--5it43qgchpWgsN8eeb1vLEs1eECQIhRJV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlYqlK0ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20GUgCgtvWyqRugFydM2iQafYxn0pta
kQ8AoLdGQslGTPH40tBVyzDWXkLftmLx
=uFQE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5it43qgchpWgsN8eeb1vLEs1eECQIhRJV--