From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: rados and the next firefly release v0.80.11 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:13:45 +0200 Message-ID: <562A94F9.2080501@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DkDq1xHjGrHQTdqA6lq9HfKib5Q3aebRo" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:49017 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751238AbbJWUNr (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:13:47 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Samuel Just Cc: Ceph Development , Nathan Cutler This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --DkDq1xHjGrHQTdqA6lq9HfKib5Q3aebRo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sam, The next firefly release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/fi= refly passed the rados suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#note-1= 10). Do you think the firefly branch is ready for QE to start their own r= ound of testing ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --DkDq1xHjGrHQTdqA6lq9HfKib5Q3aebRo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlYqlPkACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21nWQCfZfiLXbux1R9c1fasRpEF3DEq vTgAn3zygEkgFprYTFrVfh5Mas+0CyYq =2E5d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DkDq1xHjGrHQTdqA6lq9HfKib5Q3aebRo--